Fossy21
Nobel Prize Deke
- Mar 14, 2013
- 20,277
- 2,350
Sure, if Canada's top 4 or 5 best defencemen retired.
Humour me.
Sure, if Canada's top 4 or 5 best defencemen retired.
Why don't we just give your team the medal right now? Because you're so good and all,...
The World Cup was 3 months agoWhat players have magically popped up in the last 3 months that change your fortune?
I'm actually wondering if the officiating got in Swedens head because they COMPLETELY unraveled.
US might as well hand the gold to Canada if this is the type of officiating expected for tomorrow.
The best player does not necessarily play in the best team.
I'm actually wondering if the officiating got in Swedens head because they COMPLETELY unraveled.
US might as well hand the gold to Canada if this is the type of officiating expected for tomorrow.[/QUOTE
You can't be serious. If anything the Swedish team could had more penalties called against them. All in all they didn't do that bad a job, really had no influence in the outcome.
One of the referees was an American= Daniel Stricker and the other was Finnish- Anssi SALONEN.
It waz bad for sure
What's great about the future is that anything is possible.
Just like Canada continuing to dominate best on best.
I guess you are just ignoring all the Americans from the U24NA team that were kept from playing on the US team.
I guess you are just ignoring all the Americans from the U24NA team that were kept from playing on the US team.
These tournaments are coin flips. Not a real indication of where the best hockey is played. Just look at the NHL which country produces the most players.
The officiating was bad both ways, give it a break.
I'm actually wondering if the officiating got in Swedens head because they COMPLETELY unraveled.
US might as well hand the gold to Canada if this is the type of officiating expected for tomorrow.
NyQuil said:i think we typically play well against the Swedes.
I guess you are just ignoring all the Americans from the U24NA team that were kept from playing on the US team.
Canada obviously deserved to win. They were clearly better. Only line on Sweden that felt like it could score was the 1st line. Sweden never really tested Hart, he only made the easy saves and he got a perfect start right after coming in, with Sweden shooting the puck right at him. Wouldn't be so convinced with him.
Will be cheering hard for USA in the Final though, like i usually do when you guys face each other, that's for sure. Not necessarily because you beat Sweden today, but because once again, you prove that you're the sorest winners in hockey. You guys are all talking like Sweden were the ones trashtalking before the game, even though it was in fact you. Besides all this, you despises embellishment and "cheating" more than anyone else. You value playing hard and being tough more than anyone else. Yet who were the ones selling it left and right today? Your best players. Embarassing. No way i could cheer for a team like that.
Humour me.
You mean like McDavid? Couturier? Ekblad? Rielly? MacKinnon? Drouin?
Those guys?
The only thing embarrassing in that game, was Swedens performance.
Probably yes. With our choking history against Canada in playoffs and especially in North America. And Canadian players a little more used to physical, direct play and use of cheap tricks/do whatever you need to get a win I think it's likely that bad refs gets under the skin of our swedish players even if it's bad refs both ways. That's pretty clear if you look into the history, especially in the WJC I would say.
So what?
Well nobody the U S team would have picked. Kessel couldn't even make that team as a scrub....Who would'va played on the US team on team NA?