Well I took the night to process the news from yesterday before responding. Like many I’m disappointed because we lose two regular players for a lengthy time as we head towards the playoffs.
I’m not going to say the players shouldn’t have got no consequence for the their actions. They broke a league policy which they are well informed through league wide education throughout the season.
What I am upset about is the leagues length to come to their decision. Not sure of how the process went. Not sure if there was a meeting with the players involved including the Barrie player, families, team representatives, agents and league officials.
As well it appears to me the league has work to do of their own in finding an appropriate balance in handing out consequences with such incidents. I believe they are somewhat old school and just looking at punishment rather than focusing on conflict resolution. This suspension will only increase tension and hostility rather than eliminate any fear or retribution on the Barrie player. If no meeting between the parties had taken place. This would be a perfect opportunity for the players to share the feelings at the time of the on ice incident, their initial reaction, and eventually an apology to the Barrie player. This way the league addresses the incident, has conflict resolution, and then reviews what it an appropriate length for a suspension. This seems pretty heavy handed but then again I don’t know how it all transpired. But judging in the past the OHL is notorious for acting as judge and jury and I doubt they have would have proceeded with any sort of conflict resolution.
These are still kids living away from parents, under pressure and still learning to become better men. They make mistakes. The negative media attention on this alone is really going to impact them more than the suspension.
WJ