Linkens Mastery
Conductor of the TankTown Express
Barbie is 5 points away from his career high.
i know ... count me in that boat .... ... husso aint going nowhereHow is Husso the odd man out? Dude is rocking a 2.46 GAA and a .927 save%
God we sour on our goalies too fast.
Husso isn’t going anywhere.Given the high quality of netminding we’re getting and the sudden abundance of options, unless something goes south, Husso is the odd man out. That can easily change.
I think Binny/Lindy is an epic tandem waiting to happen.
Krug had a couple bad passes/giveaways that Faulk was able to get back in time to defend against, but, overall he did fine.It seemed like Krug had a pretty good game from my limited viewing. I saw him assertively move the puck out of danger and get some offense generating. Did I just catch the right parts of the game or did he perform well the whole time?
Faulk looked like a #1 D last night and Parayko was the guy we are clamoring to see.
To be fair to Lindgren, he's been on some pretty pathetic teams since turning pro. The Canadiens have only ever made the playoffs once while he was a backup, and that was a round robin playoff berth. Laval Rocket were also extremely terrible while he was down in the AHL, never finishing higher than 6th in their division. Most of the goalies in that organization have played mediocre when looking at sv% and gaa. On a few occasions, someone goes on a run for like 10 ish games and has a really good gaa. This seems like another Brian Elliott situation where Lindgren performs super well when he has a competent team to back him up. Obviously isn't going to out duel Price 9/10 times one on one, but he could definitely hold his own if it were the Canadiens playing the Blues. I think he's somewhere in the middle of his career stats, probably close to a .912-.915 sv% and 2.6-2.8 gaa kind of guy. Definitely a serviceable backup but not quite a starter.
but but.. I read right here we didn't miss Faulk while he was outIt seemed like Krug had a pretty good game from my limited viewing. I saw him assertively move the puck out of danger and get some offense generating. Did I just catch the right parts of the game or did he perform well the whole time?
Faulk looked like a #1 D last night and Parayko was the guy we are clamoring to see.
call ups = play berube hockeyThis is Berube in his domain. Getting the most out of ragtag, depleted group. He's similar to Hitchcock in that regard.
I'm not one to continuously rip Krug but he looks to be really lacking confidence on his side of center. Parayko & Faulk were studs last night.
Interesting to ponder - what if Lindgren had been given the chance that Binnington got for the Cup run?
Sports is funny that way - takes luck sometimes (and perseverance) to get the opportunity of a lifetime.
He clearly turned his skate's heel area into the puck, on an angle that would send it into the open portion of the net, when if he HADN'T flicked his heel, changing the angle, the puck would have been sent on a straighter trajectory more towards the goalie, who would have been a lot more likely to stop it. So, in my opinion, the goal shouldn't have counted in any case. The call of "good goal" should only apply, IF the puck was propelled back towards the goal only by the forward momentum of the skater's movement towards the net, with no change in direction or separate effort by the skater to direct it at a specific trajectory. It was obvious that the tweek of the skate's heel re-directed the puck towards its ideal landing place.That should have never been a goal in the first place. Peca clearly kicked it.
Well...."clearly" from MY perspective.
I'm happy for all three of them - Binner, Husso, and Lindgren. They've all played their way into long-term NHL relevance over the last few years.
It's a great problem to have. Either Husso or Lindgren could become a valuable trade chip with the confidence that either of them look like quite competent NHL backups. Whichever one could be packaged in the right deal or returns a draft pick that could restock the cupboard in other areas, that's gravy.
Husso isn’t going anywhere.
He’s played well this season and Armstrong spent years of hyping him up to be the goalie of the future.
Husso has a .927 through 7 games this year. There is absolutely no need for anyone to defend or "back" his game.The same way people are jumping up to defend Husso is exactly how it went with Jake Allen and many upon many people claimed the same and backed him like this.
Look how that went. One rookie call up and months later we’re hoisting the Cup.
Im not saying we’ll get rid of Husso but we’re also not going to bench or send down a call up that’s rocking ~2 GAA and ~.950.
I’m pretty sure Husso will get another chance but right now it’s Charlie’s job to lose.
Husso possibly being the odd man out is a NICE problem to have.
Holy over-reaction Batman. The guy has played 3 games.The same way people are jumping up to defend Husso is exactly how it went with Jake Allen and many upon many people claimed the same and backed him like this.
Look how that went. One rookie call up and months later we’re hoisting the Cup.
Im not saying we’ll get rid of Husso but we’re also not going to bench or send down a call up that’s rocking ~2 GAA and ~.950.
I’m pretty sure Husso will get another chance but right now it’s Lindy’s job to lose.
Husso possibly being the odd man out is a NICE problem to have.
Perhaps “clearly kicked it” are poor choices of words, but clear kicking motion may be more appropriate.He clearly turned his skate's heel area into the puck, on an angle that would send it into the open portion of the net, when if he HADN'T flicked his heel, changing the angle, the puck would have been sent on a straighter trajectory more towards the goalie, who would have been a lot more likely to stop it. So, in my opinion, the goal shouldn't have counted in any case. The call of "good goal" should only apply, IF the puck was propelled back towards the goal only by the forward momentum of the skater's movement towards the net, with no change in direction or separate effort by the skater to direct it at a specific trajectory. It was obvious that the tweek of the skate's heel re-directed the puck towards its ideal landing place.
The same way people are jumping up to defend Husso is exactly how it went with Jake Allen and many upon many people claimed the same and backed him like this.
Look how that went. One rookie call up and months later we’re hoisting the Cup.
Im not saying we’ll get rid of Husso but we’re also not going to bench or send down a call up that’s rocking ~2 GAA and ~.950.
I’m pretty sure Husso will get another chance but right now it’s Lindy’s job to lose.
Husso possibly being the odd man out is a NICE problem to have.
It has been a great couple weeks to be a Blues fan. Facing overwhelmingly difficult circumstances, this team has taken points in 9 of the last 10, which includes the current 6 game point streak. This has been incredibly fun to watch and the OT winner vs Florida after Husso went down was probably my favorite moment at the Enterprise Center so far this year. The fact that 4 different goalies have earned the team points in that stretch is insane.
With all that said, we aren't close to a goalie controversy. Goalies get hot in small sample sizes. It is the nature of the position and I fully and truly believe that there are 200 goalies in the world that are capable of looking like an elite NHL goalie for a week or two if you catch them at their absolute best. The things that separate legit NHL guys from guys struggling to stay in the AHL are how often you get their best and the gap between their best, their average, and their worst.
Scott Wedgewood posted a .941 through his first 3 starts (and 1 relief appearance) with the Coyotes this year. He had another 2 good games after that, posting a .913 and a .971 to put him at a .940 in his first 323 minutes with the franchise. He's been an .881 in the 295 minutes since.
Dustin Tokarski put up a .936 in his first 3 starts for Buffalo this year. He's .894 since.
Stuart Skinner had a 3 game stretch where he went .961 and only allowed 3 total goals. He's allowed 3+ goals in each of his 5 other NHL games this year.
This post isn't a knock on Lindgren. he's playing great and he should continue getting chances to prove that he's not a fluke. Enjoy the ride. It has been awesome for the last week and I sincerely hope it continues. We've heard nothing about Husso and he got hurt on a non-contact lateral movement. That usually means (at least) several weeks on the shelf, so I expect Lindgren to keep getting some time while Binner comes out of COVID protocol. But you just don't start even considering any permanent goalie decisions based on a good AHL start and 186 NHL minutes.
Binner earned that opportunity. He played 38 AHL games at a .926 over the 12+ months leading up to his call up. He was absolutely fortunate given the performance of players ahead of him on the depth chart, but he did everything a goalie can do to demonstrate his ability for an extended period of time. In 2019, I can say with confidence that Lindgren would have squandered that opportunity. He was in the midst of a 3 year stretch of posting sub-.900 goaltending in the AHL that saw his goalie partner outperform him each year. He had a .902 NHL SV% through 21 starts in that stretch. His on-ice performance was substantially worse than Binner's in both the AHL and NHL at the time of that opportunity. I can say with full certainty that we don't win the Cup if Lindgren had been the call up in 2018/19. That doesn't mean that he can't ever become and NHL goalie. He may have honed his game into something real and sustainable since then. But Binner's ascendance while Lindgren toiled in obscurity was about a hell of a lot more than good fortune. I have passionately argued here that the Blues weren't mistaken to have not given Binner a shot earlier in his career. He wasn't good enough early in his career. But he dedicated himself to hockey, improved his game and had earned the call up by the time it came. Good fortune is usually a part of success in sports, but it takes more than that.