Flyers Time
Registered User
- May 4, 2012
- 1,539
- 832
Eklund Rumor: Steve Mason to the Kings
- Thread starter Flyers Time
- Start date
- Status
MMC
Global Moderator
McDonald19
Registered User
uncleben
Global Moderator
Regardless of who first brought it up, Eklund, MacKenzie or an hfboard poster speculating or suggesting a trade, let's talk about how a deal like this would go down. thats the point of the board.
what would LA need to give up?
what would LA need to give up?
Last edited by a moderator:
funky
Build around Byfield, not the vets
- Mar 9, 2002
- 7,067
- 4,727
I will give Eklund one thing, he seems a little bit closer to reality on Flyer related news than any other. The teams have trade history and DL groomed Hextall. Unfortunately I cringe as an LA fan as I think the student is about to surpass his Master. I have a lot of respect for Hextall and still wish he was in LA.
Curufinwe
Registered User
- Feb 28, 2013
- 56,994
- 45,414
More than a 2nd, less than a 1st, is my estimation.
I don't know what prospects LA have that are actually available for a goalie rental.
Reaper45
Registered User
JojoTheWhale
"You should keep it." -- Striiker
- May 22, 2008
- 35,944
- 111,070
His Flyers sources dried up post Hextall transition. He runs a pretty tight ship.
Forgetting value, I don't see how Hextall could trade one goalie wihtout extending the other. Both would be tricky negotiations at this point.
funky
Build around Byfield, not the vets
- Mar 9, 2002
- 7,067
- 4,727
Good to know, he does take after Dean being tight lipped. Mason could be effective behind our tight defence first system. Want King?
FLyers fans will tell you he's been great, worth a fair bit etc. Everyone else will say he's worth chump change.
Number1RedWingsFan52
Registered User
Yeah he lives in Philly and is a blogger for them, So he might've a little more insightful on the Flyers organization.
Last edited:
Starat327
Top .01% OnlyHands
Flyers aren't tanking. Even with the potential to lose him, we aren't giving him up cheap. Statistically, he's been a top 10 goalie since joining the flyers. He wouldn't come cheap, and the flyers can't take back cap to make it work for Kings anyway.
Estlin
Registered User
Curufinwe
Registered User
- Feb 28, 2013
- 56,994
- 45,414
Number1RedWingsFan52
Registered User
Doubt that the Kings have any interest in Mason, Still cost them $4.1 million for the season and all. Would think that they might look for a cheaper alternative elsewhere depending on the outcome of Jonathon Quick.
SB84
Registered User
Would be a good pickup by the Kings, however the question is, as always, what are the Kings willing to part with that the Flyers wold be interested in?
Kings fans, who is available, who is not, what prospects are untouchable, etc?
What about Dwight King and someone like Kempe?
Kings fans, who is available, who is not, what prospects are untouchable, etc?
What about Dwight King and someone like Kempe?
ADifferentTim
Knowledgeable & Pure
Starat327
Top .01% OnlyHands
Doubt the kings are going to offer up enough to to make it worthwhile. Rather save it for deadline deals like Streit, etc if we're out of it.
Number1RedWingsFan52
Registered User
FLYLine27*
BUCH
Would rather trade Neuvy. Resting our #1 goaltending hopes on him is fools gold. The guy just can't stay healthy.
In that link above of all of Eklund's rumors, I have seen:
- Rangers in on Luke Schenn
- Brayden Schenn for Shattenkirk
- Simmonds + Schenn for Hemsky
AlphaBravo
Registered User
The Kings are not going to trade their best forward prospect (Kempe) for a goalie rental. Nor would they part with a pick higher than 3rd round. Its better for the Kings to ride out Zatkoff and tank the season then mortgage the future for a rental goalie, considering we are not even contenders this year.
The best I would do is Dwight King and 3rd round pick for Mason (50% retained).
Kings aren't paying that for a backup at 4.1M.
Kings just need to ride it out and get a high draft pick at this point.
- Status
