For people happy about this, how would you feel if it was not Alex Steen but some no name player who was super smart with just less talent. If the resume was, he washed out of the NHL quickly, played in Europe, retired, scouted for a year and then was named AGM/GM in waiting. I think many are blinded by Steen's name and skill as a player.
If you gave him Armstrong’s current authority, I’d be concerned. He doesn’t answer to anyone but the ownership. But Steen or the hypothetical player you asked about will have an experienced President of Hockey Operations who I trust.
How do they divide their responsibilities and how involved is that President? Its pretty easy to imagine a gradual shift to greater autonomy for Steen as he grows into the job.
For some GM candidates, that would be insufficient authority. Armstrong would have said NO to that arrangement in Steen’s role. But this works to Steen’s advantage.
It’s also not fair to expect him to have a bunch of preparatory executive experience when he was playing professional hockey during the same time other guys have been “assistant director of salary cap compliance” or whatever. It’s not like Steen hasn’t received an education about a lot of hockey operations from his experience as a player.
I think you are missing the possibility that Steen is recognized by multiple sources as a rising star. There is a good reason the Blues are acting now to secure his services.