Proposal: Stars/Caps

SherVaughn30

Registered User
Jan 12, 2010
5,631
3,660
Los Angeles
If the Stars don't look like they will make the playoffs:

:starsget Hagelin($2.75 million cap hit with another year after this one) + Vanecek($716k cap hit, RFA at seasons end) + conditional pick(lower end)

:caps get Raffl($1.1 million cap hit, UFA at seasons end) + Holtby($2 million cap hit, UFA at seasons end)

This Proposal is negotiable(please no flaming, trashing, etc. if you don't like the proposal then just say no thanks!)
 

Alexander the Gr8

Registered User
May 2, 2013
31,996
13,620
Toronto
Raffl was terrible for the Caps and Holtby was awful too in his last season here. I don't see why we would try to get back two guys that we got rid of in the past 2 years.

Hagelin's not much better but I'd rather keep Vanecek in the bunch and bring in another goaltender that isn't Holtby.
 

SherVaughn30

Registered User
Jan 12, 2010
5,631
3,660
Los Angeles
Raffl was terrible for the Caps and Holtby was awful too in his last season here. I don't see why we would try to get back two guys that we got rid of in the past 2 years.

Hagelin's not much better but I'd rather keep Vanecek in the bunch and bring in another goaltender that isn't Holtby.

Holtby is 2 years removed from playing with the Caps and he's playing well again. He's a better option backing up Samsonov the rest of the season and going into the playoffs than Vanecek. The Caps really need a vet goalie presence who has good experience and can be a mentor for Samsonov. Regarding Raffl, he wasn't terrible as the whole team looked bad at times towards the playoffs last season. Also, Raffl was re-signed because it was an easy decision to open up a little salary cap room for this season. The Caps can't rely the whole season on rookie/young centers for depth. A vet center should be brought in, as Raffl already knows Lavi's coaching system.
 

SherVaughn30

Registered User
Jan 12, 2010
5,631
3,660
Los Angeles
Raffl was terrible for the Caps and Holtby was awful too in his last season here. I don't see why we would try to get back two guys that we got rid of in the past 2 years.

Hagelin's not much better but I'd rather keep Vanecek in the bunch and bring in another goaltender that isn't Holtby.
By the way, if the Caps bring in another goalie they will most certainly need to have Vanecek going back in the trade deal or another deal. Keeping 3 goalies doesn't work and Vanecek could easily be picked up if put on waivers. Also he's certainly not a go to option in the playoffs if Samsonov happens to falter/injury/protocol list.
 

Alexander the Gr8

Registered User
May 2, 2013
31,996
13,620
Toronto
By the way, if the Caps bring in another goalie they will most certainly need to have Vanecek going back in the trade deal or another deal. Keeping 3 goalies doesn't work and Vanecek could easily be picked up if put on waivers. Also he's certainly not a go to option in the playoffs if Samsonov happens to falter/injury/protocol list.

Last year we had to play Craig Anderson due to both goaltenders being unavailable at the same time. I think VV is OK for that 3rd string role.

You are right about one thing though, it's that the market for goaltenders is shallow. Ideally the Caps would go after MAF as a rental at the deadline but I'm not sure they'll be able to afford it and that he'd be willing to be traded to Washington.
 

BG44

Registered User
Jul 19, 2021
4,198
3,297
Makes little to no sense from a Dallas perspective. You're asking for 2 assets that could actually net futures for Dallas, but instead, you're offering $2.75 million in salary for 2022-23 and a goalie who would be playing behind Oettinger. The framework for a realistic trade doesn't involve Hagelin or Vanecek.

Dallas would be shopping those players for picks.
 

SherVaughn30

Registered User
Jan 12, 2010
5,631
3,660
Los Angeles
Makes little to no sense from a Dallas perspective. You're asking for 2 assets that could actually net futures for Dallas, but instead, you're offering $2.75 million in salary for 2022-23 and a goalie who would be playing behind Oettinger. The framework for a realistic trade doesn't involve Hagelin or Vanecek.

Dallas would be shopping those players for picks.
I offered a conditional pick. You could have countered for something like a 2nd or Sprong since the Stars need goal scoring. You also could have done a counter proposal of something like Hagelin+Vanecek for Khudobin with retained salary or something.

If Raffl and Holtby were traded separately, you might get a 4th round pick for Raffl and a 3rd round pick for Holtby. Whether combined in a trade or separate, the Stars would gain assets because they signed both to 1 year contracts.
 

Dr Quincy

Registered User
Jun 19, 2005
29,368
11,679
I think DAL would just prefer to deal Holtby somewhere for a pick or prospect.
 

BG44

Registered User
Jul 19, 2021
4,198
3,297
I offered a conditional pick. You could have countered for something like a 2nd or Sprong since the Stars need goal scoring. You also could have done a counter proposal of something like Hagelin+Vanecek for Khudobin with retained salary or something.

If Raffl and Holtby were traded separately, you might get a 4th round pick for Raffl and a 3rd round pick for Holtby. Whether combined in a trade or separate, the Stars would gain assets because they signed both to 1 year contracts.

I made the counter but you're just not satisfied with the explanation. Anything outside of picks or futures like middling prospects makes little sense to Dallas. There's no further debate necessary or counters to take on a salary dump or backup goalie when discussing those two players you specified.

Something around Hagelin and Khudobin isn't impossible to see happening but it also has nothing to do with your original post about Holtby and Raffl. That's something I could see Nill doing (he's done Gonchar for Moen before just to shuffle the deck and move out an overpaid vet at one position for a different one). Holtby or Raffl would be entirely separate deals, and your example of a 3rd and 4th for those 2 guys is better for Dallas than adding payroll and a backup goalie.

You either wanted an honest evaluation from Dallas' perspective or not. The reality is Hagelin and Vanecek likely have less value to Dallas than picks. Your new discussion about Khduobin and Hagelin isn't out of Nill's wheelhouse, but personally, I wouldn't retain money. That's doesn't mean in a fair world Dallas should I'm only saying Dallas already had an easy solution with Khudobin. Say they retain $1 million to make that deal happen ... fine, you're still stuck with a forward that doesn't fit with the team. Just buy Khudobin out and be done with it. He'll be owed less than $1 million next season and $1.25 against the cap the following season.

From a Dallas perspective, Hagelin or Vanecek don't make enough season to try and come up with creative counters where 1 or both of those guys end up in Dallas.
 

Moose and Squirrel

Registered User
Jan 15, 2021
3,685
2,703
Raffl was terrible for the Caps and Holtby was awful too in his last season here. I don't see why we would try to get back two guys that we got rid of in the past 2 years.

Hagelin's not much better but I'd rather keep Vanecek in the bunch and bring in another goaltender that isn't Holtby.
obviously this is just a trade to free up salary for WAS
 

Hivemind

We're Touched
Oct 8, 2010
37,453
14,095
Philadelphia
I'm all about getting out of Hagelin's deal, but this doesn't help the Capitals. Braden Holtby has been ruined by Scott Murray before, and Scott Murray is still the goalie coach in Washington. Even without Murray, the expectations of a Holtby return would set both him and Samsonov up for failure. As soon as Sammy has a mediocre game, folks would be calling for Holtby to become the starter. And Holtby isn't going to be able to live up to his reputation in DC (and definitely not with the goalie coach that tanked his career still in charge).

Raffl is also not what Washington needs. Been there, done that.

obviously this is just a trade to free up salary for WAS
Free up salary by moving a goaltender that makes less than league minimum?
 

Moose and Squirrel

Registered User
Jan 15, 2021
3,685
2,703
I'm all about getting out of Hagelin's deal, but this doesn't help the Capitals. Braden Holtby has been ruined by Scott Murray before, and Scott Murray is still the goalie coach in Washington. Even without Murray, the expectations of a Holtby return would set both him and Samsonov up for failure. As soon as Sammy has a mediocre game, folks would be calling for Holtby to become the starter. And Holtby isn't going to be able to live up to his reputation in DC (and definitely not with the goalie coach that tanked his career still in charge).

Raffl is also not what Washington needs. Been there, done that.


Free up salary by moving a goaltender that makes less than league minimum?
for WAS it brings in 2 expiring contracts for ones that expire in 2 yrs
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad