AfroThunder396
[citation needed]
Kevyn Adams disliked this postMaybe he is just sad and misses the palm trees in Tampa.
Kevyn Adams disliked this postMaybe he is just sad and misses the palm trees in Tampa.
Were they ever? I thought the consensus was that it was a shame to see a deal not get done, but the price he wanted didn't make sense for the impact he had on games.Curious ... are Tampa fans still pissed off about losing Stamkos?
I think Stamkos would still be very successful in Tampa. He's in a bad situation and nothing is going in. This happens to players often.
Were they ever? I thought the consensus was that it was a shame to see a deal not get done, but the price he wanted didn't make sense for the impact he had on games.
Opportunity to sign a great to elite player in his prime over one on the aging decline. Stamkos was never getting more than we offered with the opportunity to get Jake. Especially with the team they have they had to make a decision. Younger and better 5v5 was a good recipe for anyone and if vasi is more consistent when it means most they will be tough again in the playoffs. It sucks for stamkos because he's probably still best fit as far as production goes is on the Lightning with our pp setup and he's been a great captain for us he just wasnt getting the contract he got in Nashville in Tampa.Guentzel is on pace for 49 goals and 88 points.
Safe to say Tampa management knew what was up.
Never were...Curious ... are Tampa fans still pissed off about losing Stamkos?
Takes some stones to just give up on your franchise player and captain and let him walk away in free agency.
His ask was rumored at 4-5mil, we were apparently offering around 3. For 4ish mil I would love to still have his shot on this team and to keep the leader/face of the franchise around. No matter what, JBB handled the whole thing very poorly and I'll always be pissed about that.Curious ... are Tampa fans still pissed off about losing Stamkos?
I still don't agree with this. I'd love you to provide some numbers to back this up.It's been a little bit since I looked up the numbers but I believe it was about 40-45% of Stamkos' even strength time playing with Kucherov, so him being in on 11/21 ES goals isn't too surprising. And they were always on the PP together and that's where close to half of Stamkos total goals came from when looking at total goals.
Obviously playing with Kuch will give a boost to his numbers over other linemates, but my point was Stamkos ES points away from Kuch last year weren't nearly as bad as his numbers have been so far this season. I don't think he's regressed so much as it's a fact that he's going to struggle to produce on a struggling team because his one big asset is his shot.
Guentzel is on pace for 49 goals and 88 points.
Safe to say Tampa management knew what was up.
I don't really have much hope for this even if Bruno gets canned. No coach is going to make the "hard" decision of playing him heavily sheltered, offensive zone only 3rd/4th line minutes at ES and then just load the PP time (he's been our 3rd highest TOI forward at ES, which is not a recipe for success).I agree, his playing driving wouldn't necessarily look that much better on a good team...but the results would be much better on a good team. I am still hopeful if Bruno gets canned, we can put Stamkos in a position to be successful, but that hope is fading. He's getting older. This is the year we should be putting him in position to be successful, as with all the players, but unfortunately Bruno is unwavering on how he thinks the game should be played. The roster just isn't a good fit for the frantic up and down play he envisions.
I think it goes even beyond a good team and bad team. He needs an elite of the elite playmaker.It’s pretty well established that Stamkos hasn’t been a play driver since the leg injury. He’s a shooter and still one of the best at that in the league. That means on a good team he’ll put up good numbers and on a bad team put up bad numbers. The whole Preds team has been awful this year, of course his numbers will look bad.
Stamkos went on a heater after the TDL and got his 5v5 numbers somewhat respectable, away from Kuvherov. They were putrid before that. I don't know that he has many of those heaters left in the tank.It's been a little bit since I looked up the numbers but I believe it was about 40-45% of Stamkos' even strength time playing with Kucherov, so him being in on 11/21 ES goals isn't too surprising. And they were always on the PP together and that's where close to half of Stamkos total goals came from when looking at total goals.
Obviously playing with Kuch will give a boost to his numbers over other linemates, but my point was Stamkos ES points away from Kuch last year weren't nearly as bad as his numbers have been so far this season. I don't think he's regressed so much as it's a fact that he's going to struggle to produce on a struggling team because his one big asset is his shot.