Well IMO Stafford will put up good numbers in Carolina, and being a UFA that gives him great trade value at the deadline.
Nobody puts up good numbers in Carolina.
So I wouldn't assume Stafford will. Even so, it's the UFA aspect that lowers his value for me.
I factored in Stafford trade value into the deal.
I get that, but for a team like Carolina who, at best will be a bubble team, a 30YO UFA to be isn't as valuable. Re: the deadline aspect: IMO, (a) you can't assume he'll be moved at he deadline and (b) even if he is, he'll be moved for guys that likely won't be in the NHL for 3+ years. That's not not what the Canes are looking for.
Also, I think Trouba to Carolina makes a ton of sense. After Faulk, Carolina has Pesce and a good prospect. Getting Trouba gives Carolina a RHD two-headed monster. On the Left side, Hanafin and Slavin.
Oh, don't get me wrong. I'm not saying Trouba wouldn't be a fit on Carolina. I'd love to have him behind Faulk on the RHD side. But the Canes have 2 problems right now. (1) Scoring goals and (2) Goaltending. Moving Jordan Staal, who not only can put up close to 50 points on a crappy offensive team, also is the teams best defensive forward makes a big hole on the team.
Someone like McKeown, Murphy, Fleury could also be dealt for any need the Canes might have(value aside).
In that situation, Pesce would become available.
Maybe, but that's counting on a lot of moving parts and assuming that these young, unproven guys can get good players back that can contribute now.
I wasn't commenting value wise, I just think moving a guy that is arguably the teams best forward for a defenseman as the main piece coming back doesn't make sense when forwards are a bigger need on the team. That's the crux of it.