A. According to Seravalli he’s ready to go for next season and they expect no issues. Go back a podcast or two where he talks about the possibility of trading Bob due to his playoff run.
B. that poster’s a troll yet you’ve shit on the kid twice AND doubled down on him not having any trade value? Lmao, pretty funny. Sure, a 23 year old former first round pick who’s got decent numbers after 57 games, was honest enough to seek help and could come back even stronger has “next to zero trade” because he was in the program.
Wrong!
He’s not going anywhere anyway, but wow.
I mean, won't be actually zero. Certainly would be disappointing compared to the pick he was taken with.
I didn't shit on him, I said no GM in the world would consider him a starter. That just means that if you have 57 games played they better be pretty freaking good games to hand him full custody of a net for a couple years. There's very little to judge his quality by and GMs don't usually take big swings on unknowns in net - especially not ours.
Also, the
As a ufa that is prob gonna ask for 8 million long term minimum yeah no one should be giving up a butload for him florida certainly wouldnt trade for him. Knight is still one of the best goalie prospects in the game the fact he was mature enough at a young enough age to address a personal issue doesn't decrease his value on the ice. Who does Winnipeg even have to offer to get Florida to listen exactly? They aren't putting connor on the table and they dont have any prospects or picks that would be enticing so where exactly did the shock and awe about my comment come from for you.
You don't know that he was "mature enough" for anything. It's not fair to speculate one way or the other, and there are reasons beyond substance abuse to be involved in that program. But in cases where it is substance abuse, sometimes the "choice" the player has is "enter treatment or we're terminating the contract."
Again, Winnipeg is not trying to get Florida to listen to anything. If he were playing for Winnipeg, it would be as a backup and that's not the way he's being paid. We have numerous options open around the league through trades we've signalled we intend to make (Dubois, Hellebuyck and probably Scheifele) and there are good cheap backups that we know like Brossoit, Comrie and Rittich that all seemed to enjoy their time here. Not to mention guys like Korpisalo who probably wouldn't cost much more than what Helle costs now.
The shock and awe comes from the fact that you tried to make an apples to apples comparison between a troubled goalie prospect and a guy that might win his 2nd Vezina next Monday (probably will be Ullmark though cos his season was historic). You said directly that Knight had a higher trade value, which is literally insane.