TootooTrain
Sandpaper
- Jun 12, 2010
- 35,513
- 474
On a live chat Richard Griffin just said AA's mentioning of Romero on the radio this morning "is a bunch of crap."
It is. Ricky hasn't looked good since 2011.
Santana didn't want to come to the AL at all costs,
So I take it people are just ignoring the fact that Santana didn't want to come to the AL at all costs, and concentrating on a 5 second Romero quote like he'll be in the rotation on opening day.
Really?
Then why were the Jays so sure they had him signed three days ago?
If he didn't want to come to the AL at all costs, why was he on the verge of signing with Toronto or Baltimore? (And likely would have if Atlanta had not suffered a major injury)
Last case scenario I assume. Which is why as soon as another team got involved it was a losing battle.
Okay, so why didn't he sign with the Twins who offered a three year deal long before Atlanta had a need and are most definitely not in the AL East?
On the weekend he had three choices: Toronto, Baltimore and Minnesota. If avoiding the AL East at all costs was his goal, then he should have signed with Minnesota right?
Okay, so why didn't he sign with the Twins who offered a three year deal long before Atlanta had a need and are most definitely not in the AL East?
On the weekend he had three choices: Toronto, Baltimore and Minnesota. If avoiding the AL East at all costs was his goal, then he should have signed with Minnesota right?
Reported choices. Could have been a few feeler calls made over that time. He made it clear he wanted a 1yr deal.
Okay, so why didn't he sign with the Twins who offered a three year deal long before Atlanta had a need and are most definitely not in the AL East?
On the weekend he had three choices: Toronto, Baltimore and Minnesota. If avoiding the AL East at all costs was his goal, then he should have signed with Minnesota right?
You're right to be frustrated, I am too... But you're wrong on this one.
AA was told they "couldn't compete with the NL" by Jay Alou
Toronto and Baltimore offered him the same money as the Braves.
Minnesota offered him 30-35/3 years which is brutal value if you're Ervin, considering Santana stands to make nearly half of that this yr alone
The way I see it - Jays met Santana's price and term, once it leaked he was close a few more teams jumped in, gave him something to think about. 2 days later Atlanta lost 2 pitchers and then showed interest. The second they met Santana's asking price he signed.
You can be all over AA for not getting a pitcher, but the reasons for that and the mistakes made happened well before this weekend
I'm not sure what I'm wrong about.
The argument the other poster was making was that the Jays didn't get Santana because he was avoiding the AL East "at all costs."
This flies directly in the face of the evidence that he was closed to signing with either Toronto or Baltimore - while ignoring a non-AL East team that had made a significant offer.
I think we agree on everything else. I think Santana would have signed with an AL East team, but he waited and an offer came along he liked better. I'm not angry with AA about Santana. He took a shot. The player went elsewhere. That's what happens in free agency.
I just don't buy the narrative that some are now spinning that: "The Jays never had a chance because Santana wouldn't go to an AL East team."
Judging by the reported offers, it went something like this:
#1 (Winner): Atlanta Braves offer a 14.1m (essentially qualifying offer) for one year.
#2: Jays offer 14m for one year.
#3: Orioles offer 13m + incentives for one year.
#4: Twins offer 33m over 3 years (he could comparatively earn roughly 29 million these next two seasons if he accepts a 2015 qualifying offer next offseason).
While the Jays were roughly in the same ballpark with the Braves, Jay Alou expressed (or rather implied, I assume) that Ervin Santana would rather pitch in the NL and build his value up. AA thought it would have been a done deal, but Santana stalled the negotiations and sought other offers before accepting this. It wasn't exactly the Jays nickel-and-diming Santana (like others mentioned), it was just Santana trying to do what's best for him and his career.
On a live chat Richard Griffin just said AA's mentioning of Romero on the radio this morning "is a bunch of crap."
so not being all doom and gloom because we didn't sign Santana makes certain people the positivity police? Would it have been nice? For sure. Is it the end of the world? Absolutely not. He'll do much better personally in Atlanta than he would have in Toronto and that's why he's a Brave. It has nothing to do with AA or the Jays ownership etc. which seems to be the common theme.Looks like the HF Positivity Police is losing this battle.