Or the other angle is the player with the worst shot paired with a player who can shoot. I would love to see Marner in Nylanders place on the third. Would be very interesting to see what Marner can do without another 11 million dollar player on his line. Honestly, maybe he would look better and prove doubters wrong.I am happy you are not a coach, all you care about is money.
Subban would be your 1D.
Style of play is also important when constructing lines.
I bet Keefe believes all 4 of Matthews, Tavares, Nylander, Marner can carry their own line, but he chose the ones that use their teammates the least to carry their own line, it is truly shocking that he wants the player with the best vision to be with an elite finisher.
Or the other angle is the player with the worst shot paired with a player who can shoot. I would love to see Marner in Nylanders place on the third. Would be very interesting to see what Marner can do without another 11 million dollar player on his line. Honestly, maybe he would look better and prove doubters wrong.
For me the biggest surprise is not spreading out the 3 X $11 mil contracts on different lines as opposed to spreading the 3 Amigo's instead.
Spread the cap vs spread the youth.
All that good stuff without stats and wizardry!The other lines were working, these lines will also work.
Lots of options - i hope Keefe remains flexible and willing to mix it up often going forward.
All that good stuff without stats and wizardry!
Impressive !
Go Leafs Go
![]()
Who was that with?He put up 90+ points without an 11 million dollar player.. go look at previous seasons if you want to know
Honestly, this line combination has me very intrigued.
I have seen people post these balanced line combo's before in the past and I never really cared for them TBH. Not sure what has changed. Maybe the fact that it has become a reality now I am actually giving it the thought it always probably deserved
To me, it just makes so much sense to at the very least trial these lines for a handful of games. We need to go into playoffs with every combination explored IMO. I feel like our top guys have been neutralized in years past when it comes to the playoffs. Teams line match our big boys and they end up playing to a neutral game script for 7 games. If anything a marginally positive game script. Certainly not what you need from that level of players. This type of combination may hinder Auston's offence a touch, but ultimately that means nothing to me if it produces more W's. Especially when it matters the most.
Willy has been elite this year. I really truly hope they have made it abundantly clear to him specifically that this is not a demotion. Not that I really think Willy gives a shit or not, but his play this year needs to be celebrated in every way. His attention to detail on both sides of the ice has been exceptional. I really don't see this as a demotion at all, it's an assignment. Sort of like Kadri, but instead of it being a defensive role it will be more of an offensive exploitation role.
Say what you will about Keefe, he is constantly shuffling the deck in and out of the game itself. There should be no stone left unturned going into playoffs and he appears to be doing that right now.
cannot wait to see this in action tomorrow TBH.
The year he put up 69 points? That's not a ppg, that is .84 ppg.Kadri/Marleau I believe
I think I am most excited about this line.I think it has a chance to succeed. The only uncertainty is whether not Kampf will be able to mesh with Kerfoot and Nylander. The other potential drawback is that it negates having a shutdown line.
I'm not opposed to change but the other lines were working pretty well weren't they?You'll know
I think he'll mesh just brace yourself for more wasted Nylander plays that Matthew's would easily bury.I think it has a chance to succeed. The only uncertainty is whether not Kampf will be able to mesh with Kerfoot and Nylander. The other potential drawback is that it negates having a shutdown line.
he was on a ~90 pt pace while playing with those two. I'm not doing the leg work to find the exact games he played with them, but he was on pace for over 90 pts and played over half the season. Unless that sample size is too small, we don't really have much to go onThe year he put up 69 points? That's not a ppg, that is .84 ppg.
I'm not opposed to change but the other lines were working pretty well weren't they?
Why the heck would you want a coach to determine his lineup based on player salary?
How do we judge if it worked?
That's why I was curious on how we will know if it works.They were that's why I don't expect these lines to be a long term thing even if they click in the next couple games
Ya I mean I understand why star players under normal circumstances would get pissy over lineup changes when the team is 25-10-3 and the offense is rolling to a decent degree. But lets be real, this is not a normal team with normal circumstances. This is a team that has historically performed as a giant when it doesn't matter and a dwarf when it counts.Marner and Matthews are about to have a pouty week....![]()
Mitch and JT are not fast enough with foot speed to carry even themselves .. they both a slower straight line skaters but with complimentary skill sets so it works as we all saw 2 seasons ago .. 2 slower guys can move up and down ice together which helps .. Mik can get in on forecheck and help them too
Why would you assume they're upset?Ya I mean I understand why star players under normal circumstances would get pissy over lineup changes when the team is 25-10-3 and the offense is rolling to a decent degree. But lets be real, this is not a normal team with normal circumstances. This is a team that has historically performed as a giant when it doesn't matter and a dwarf when it counts.
I really don't think Mitch or Auston have earned the right to be upset at this TBH.
This is about establishing a successful model when the dial gets turned up. Whenever that happens, seemingly that combination is nowhere to be seen, positively or negatively. We cannot have that continue to happen.
I have always loved how willing Sheldon is to switch things up in game if he has a bad feel for a line. I really think by trying this combo out it will just give him more insight on when to use this type of lineup. It's never a bad thing to keep teams guessing. I suspect this type of lineup might actually stick for a bit, and if/when it gets stale, I am confident we will go back to something more like what we are used to seeing.
It's all about experimentation at this point. Like @Enga Olly said earlier, We're taking advantage of our current position in the standings. We afforded ourselves the luxury of trying to optimize our lineup. This can only be viewed as a positive IMO. Even if it is a complete fail. I'd rather them experiment now vs. game 3 of the first round when we've lost the first 2