Timo Time
73-9
With a player like Duchene, even with little assets; as a GM you make it known you're interested. He'd be an amazing addition, it's just that a top-4 D (Braun) + a blue chip prospect is going the other way to even start.
If I'm remembering correctly, it's unfair to single out Winnik. It was a group picture and (Couture's) girlfriend was just next to Winnik among the others. I don't think there were any locker-room issues, just him being frustrated with Woodcroft's dumb systems.
I think any "locker-room issues" were fabricated after he left Anaheim, though like PF said, it could just as easily be him being hard to sign.
For me, when good players like Winnik, Versteeg, Parenteau, Stempniak keep bouncing around the league, I feel like there has to be something up. Every season signing those type of guys are always "steals", and yet their teams never re-sign them.
I think in Stempniak's case its usually because he gets traded as a rental somewhere, and then he ends up being unimpressive in the playoffs, or the team has cap issues, or in the case last year, the Bruins missed the playoffs. It's Dominic Moore syndrome so to speak.
So fairly certain that Heed gets his 1st NHL game tomorrow against the Flames. Thinking Jones still starts because it is a division game. But honestly, would rather see Dell.
Does anyone even bother to factor in salary in this Duchene fantasy?? Trade the farm for a guy who has 2 more years at 6 mil $. Whats he going to want on his next deal? 7+ would be a starting point. Pavs and Couture will both need deals at the same time as Duchene. Couture a raise and Pavs probably gets 6mil again unless he falls off the zamboni..
Landeskog on the other hand is signed for 4 more years at 5.75mil and a year younger.. I think I'd go after him. No reason he couldnt be a 30/30 player on this team. And he has better playoff numbers than Duchene
Duchene has scored 30 goals 1 time in his 8yrs in the NHL.. Doesn't seem like he's someone I'd invest the kind of booty some of you are throwing out there.
That is a problem the Sharks will eventually have to fix. Top-end, franchise-caliber forwards do not come cheaply. Thornton is an aberration; most of them will want 8+ million. To be frank, the fact that every player seems to take a bit of a discount with the Sharks makes me optimistic that Duchene would do the same. But if you want top-end talent, it comes with a high-end price tag.
Understand that Duchene would instantly be the 2nd best forward on the team, and 3rd best player on the Sharks. If Thornton's bout of poor play is more permanent, he'd go up by one.
As Dean Lombardi used to say, it isn't overpaying when you consider that without a certain asset, you cannot win a cup.
On Doan....
Montreal continues to be a big player for Doan, but so does San Jose...
Bingo. If the Kings hadn't acquired Jeff Carter mid-season in 2012, not only would they have never won a Cup, but they'd be irrelevant right now. They traded Brayden Schenn, who was considered the best prospect in hockey (legitimately), and a promising young power-forward in Wayne Simmonds.
According to Eklund:
Not buying it.
DW has always had a bone for Doan (hehe).
Tried to acquire him many moons ago....or was that Deano? I dunno, one of them did.
It was probably Doug. But "many moons ago" it would have been a decent idea.
Carter didn't get traded for Simmonds and Schenn. In the long run the Richards trade was brutal, but they won the Cup twice, so you could say it was worth it. But if they kept Simmonds and Schenn, Jack Johnson and their 2013 1st rounder (which could have gotten them Mark Dano) i'd hardly say they'd be irrelevant.
**** Shane Doan. Do not want him at all.
So if Demelo, Schlemko and possibly Martin are all injured, does that mean it's finally time to call up Joakim Ryan??
I don't think they'd give up OEL.