Ledge And Dairy
Registered User
Vastly? He's like 1.5M overpaid at most. Especially with the cap going up. He averages 25 minutes a night and plays both special teams.
Speculation: Seth Jones says he's talking with the Blackhawks about the possibility of a trade
- Thread starter Bone Density
- Start date
-
Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Well that's mostly for a lack of a better option. He's still overpaid at 8M, most UFAs are overpaid too...
Behn Wilson
Registered User
Ulysses31
Registered User
ploppsdman
Don't stand for the Hawks. Stand for Kyle Beech.
- Feb 5, 2004
- 2,047
- 758
The man signed a ridiculous contract. He ain't innocent.
He makes 9,500,000.
Why would I have the slightest sympathy?
The dude has played on loser teams his entire career and guess what ... he's part of the reason they are loser teams.
But when has this dude ever pointed a finger at himself?
He wants to whine about being on a bad blackhawk team but that didn't happen in a vacuum.
He wanted the money. He got it. Shut up and play.
Kevin Musto
Hard for Bedard
- Feb 16, 2018
- 23,206
- 29,897
Prior to going to Chicago, his clubs had made the playoffs more often than not. 4 playoff appearances and 2 series wins in 5 1/2 half years in Columbus.
No comment on the rest of what you're saying.
Ulysses31
Registered User
I don't think these are going to be easy trade talks, because I'm not sure the holdup has been his NMC, but rather the contract and Chicago's unwillingness to retain so much for so long to facilitate a trade.
I think they'd retain a little, but doubt that gets them to a point where teams are interested. I get the sense that Chicago thinks that if it starts contemplating heavy retention, then a heavily retained Jones should be really valuable. Yet I think other clubs view that as the bare minimum needed to get them to consider acquiring him, not reason to fork over a king's ransom.
There seems to be room between where the Blackhawks value a heavily retained Jones for five more years and where the rest of the league values that package. There's a decent chance they hold on to him. His increasingly clear desire for a trade might not matter very much.
Retention is simple for pending UFAs. It's a hell of a lot more complicated when it's for multiple years. Heavy retention over five years on a big contract? It's rarer than people think.
I think they'd retain a little, but doubt that gets them to a point where teams are interested. I get the sense that Chicago thinks that if it starts contemplating heavy retention, then a heavily retained Jones should be really valuable. Yet I think other clubs view that as the bare minimum needed to get them to consider acquiring him, not reason to fork over a king's ransom.
There seems to be room between where the Blackhawks value a heavily retained Jones for five more years and where the rest of the league values that package. There's a decent chance they hold on to him. His increasingly clear desire for a trade might not matter very much.
Retention is simple for pending UFAs. It's a hell of a lot more complicated when it's for multiple years. Heavy retention over five years on a big contract? It's rarer than people think.
Hunter368
Global Moderator
- Nov 8, 2011
- 27,691
- 25,480
