Macallan18
Registered User
- Aug 10, 2015
- 10,732
- 6,460
Ok ima thinking ban gambling so we don’t have to watch all the f***ing ads
I remember when the way they tried to get your cash was to sell you beer or carsOk ima thinking ban gambling so we don’t have to watch all the f***ing ads
Gotta justify the "Protection" spot that was used on him in the Seattle sweepstakes
![]()
That’s not the rules yes I agree should be reviewable but it’s not what I’m saying I can see the refs missing ithow can you be okay with that? It's f***ing stupid you can't review that play.
Basically, 4 officials didn’t see it. I call bullshit just like the officials didn’t see the Gretzky high stick on Gilmour in ‘93So are they not allowed to review those over the glass ones? What were the refs talking about then?
Ahhh the good old days….I remember when the way they tried to get your cash was to sell you beer or cars
That’s not the rules yes I agree should be reviewable but it’s not what I’m saying I can see the refs missing it
Beer, cars and smokesAhhh the good old days….
If only it were that simple, I really think it's tied to the betting line/standingsFair enough they can't get them all... but Leafs should get the next one right?? That's how they ref these days.