I'm getting really tired of people overanalyzing the Hart trophy. If you get 128 points, your value to your team is still 128 points even if you play with other stars. Maybe if a player scoring 128 points was replaced by a 60 points player the team would still have as many wins, but probably not by the same margin. The argument that a team would still make the playoffs without X player doesn't mean that the player is not valuable to his team.
People here evaluate value based on " making the playoffs" vs "not making the playoffs" too much, even if a team is still a 100 points team, bringing that team to say 120 points is still worthy of consideration for the Hart trophy.
At the end of the day, if you so far ahead better offensively, you're providing the most value to your team, even if the team has other great players.
People here evaluate value based on " making the playoffs" vs "not making the playoffs" too much, even if a team is still a 100 points team, bringing that team to say 120 points is still worthy of consideration for the Hart trophy.
At the end of the day, if you so far ahead better offensively, you're providing the most value to your team, even if the team has other great players.