Rangers394
Registered User
- Aug 5, 2020
- 902
- 845
One of the biggest differences are draft picks, Carolina hits on theirs and they contribute all over the ice, Rangers don't.Not coming here to gloat/trash talk or troll as that's not my cup of tea these days. Just wanted to reflect how the Rangers this year remind me a lot of Carolina last year, with a few notable exceptions.
1) Going into last season, most had low expectations for Carolina. Same was true for NYR this season. Carolina struggled early but came on strong in the 2nd half last year, similar to NYR this year.
2) Going into last season, Carolina had one of the youngest teams in the league and the youngest (I think) team in the playoffs, same for NYR this season.
3) Carolina had 2 highly skilled forwards (Aho and Teravainen) and NYR has 2 ( Zib and Panarin).
4) Carolina had a newly drafted #2 OA (Svech), NYR has a newly drafted #2 OA (Kakko)
5) Carolina had some decent, but not great top 6 forwards (Staal, Nino-mid season, Williams), NYR is similar with Kreider, Buch, and Strome.
6) Carolina didn't have that much depth at forward (in fact, many picked them as the worst forward group in a pre-season poll) and NYR doesn't have a lot of depth right now either. They had Wallmark (who is a scratch in Florida right now) as a 3C and McKegg as a 4C. Not too dissimilar to what NYR has now at 3C and same guy at 4C.
7) Canes did have a couple of more known quantities like Martinook (who was injured in the playoffs), McGinn, and Ferland (who was injured/playing injured/missed a lot of the playoffs), but were relying a lot on rookies, AHLrs and journeymen Foegele, Maenalanen, Phil Di Guiseppe (21 games), Clark Bishop (20 games), Victor Rask (26 games), as well as guys like Patrick Brown in the playoffs. Their bottom 6 wasn't thought of as "deep" or "good" last year at all. While it was probably slightly better than NYR's this year, it wasn't substantial IMO.
The differences were clearly blue line, where Carolina was far superior, and Goaltending, where NYR is far superior.
The other difference might be coaching/leadership? I hate to put much stock in intangible stuff and I don't know much about the NYR coaching staff, but Brind'Amour seems to have been able to get everyone to buy into playing the same way. Canes weren't (and still aren't) the most talented team, but they outwork most teams and that's probably due to Brind'Amour.
Canes beat the Caps last year, not because they were better or more skilled, it's because they outworked the Caps, who likely were suffering from some cup hangover.
Canes beat the Isles because although the Isles worked hard and had a good coach also, the Canes could match their work ethic and the Isles were less skilled than Carolina overall.
Canes got their ass handed to them against Boston because Boston was more skilled and Boston works hard. That's a tough matchup for a team like Carolina.
Like I said, I don't know enough about your coach, but I see a lot of similarities between where the teams, particularly at forward. If the NYR can figure out the blue-line, I think they are going to be a very dangerous team.
We drafted some nice players over the years but have missed out on a lot too. Aho, Geekie, Necas, Foegele, Svechnikov, Pesce, Slavin, McGinn, all these guys were drafted by Carolina and are young and contributing now. We draft Lias, Gropp, Day, Duclair, Nieves, Halverson, etc. They either bust or go play on other teams and contribute. They fill out their bottom 6 with young, energetic guys who can play, we have McKegg and Digsiueppe in our bottom 6.
As an organization, the team needs to change their entire approach when it comes to the draft. Sure, all teams have their draft failures but just because they do it, doesn't mean we need to do it too. This is a dead horse but McIrath over Tarasenko arguably cost the team a cup and right now, the Lias pick looks awful, especially when Necas who many here wanted just had a great first season and we have a huge hole at 2c. Suzuki is another guy who would be perfect at 2c.
Things like this set teams back because now you are trading assets for players you missed out on in the draft and it's a never ending cycle. Say we trade Tony D for a 2c, now we are short an offensive dman. I know Fox is here too but the point is the Rangers need to have a vision and build teams for that vision and draft guys who fit, or else it will be the same old shit.