SCF | VI | "They Said 'I'll Bet They'll Never Make It', But Just Look At Us Holding On" | Oilers vs. Panthers | 5.21.24 | 6:00PM | SN

[HanSolo]

Fans roaring for a call because McDavid skated right into a guy posted up and fell trying.

 

[HabsWhiteKnightLOL]

2-0 Edmonton and Mcdavid has no points. What sorcery is that

 

[TheBeard]

I'm a Flames fan. Please tell me how much of an Oilers fan I am lol.

Easy. You hate Tkachuk and Bennett.

 

[Neil Racki]

Verhaeghe can’t dance that puck across the blue line like that

Midget hockey

 

[Canadienna]

Oilers can't stop skating. It didn't work in Game 5 and it won't work here.

 

[Giggli G]

Was Kane a healthy scratch? Lol

He has had a sports hernia for a long time now

 

[quickfeet]

That should be a 4 minute major penalty for tripping

 

[HanSolo]

Nice trip!

Lol. Impressive to trip someone without doing anything but hold your ground

 

[Natey]

Was Kane a healthy scratch? Lol

He was a game-time decision. He's had a sports hernia or something.

 

[KeydGV21]

Seconded. I'm good with either of these teams winning and that was horrible. If it was close enough for the linesman to call it onside, it was onside.

Might as well never review if a puck crossed the goal line either with that “logic”

 

[tarheelhockey]

And this is the same league that allowed a Cup clinching goal when it was CONCLUSIVE that Brett Hull's goal was in the crease (not allowed at the time).

I will always step in to correct this.

The rule at the time was that Hull could be in the crease because he was in possession of the puck, having kicked it to his blade prior to moving into the crease. That rule was put into place in March of that season. This was confirmed by the Sabres after the fact.

I agree with all the other stuff you said, and would add that the Hull situation never had to be a controversy, because the crease replay rule was as stupid as offside replay.

 

[MaxDummy]

Never forget that the oilers bottom 3 D are Broberg Ceci and Nurse. With Skinner in net. It's not over until it's over

 

[canucks20]

I really wouldn’t want to be the team to pay Montour

 

[BoHorvat 53]

I abhor game management.

Define "fraction"

By fraction, I mean it was a bang-bang play/simultaneous and that it was definitely not clear enough to overturn the call on the ice

 

[ORRFForever]

Don't care who wins. That call is ridiculous.

Why?

Because it's so f***ing close that you cannot say it's conclusive. And if it is...Then the NHL should show the home audience the exact piece of video they based their decision on.

Still it's not in the spirit of the game and takes a goal off the board.

And this is the same league that allowed a Cup clinching goal when it was CONCLUSIVE that Brett Hull's goal was in the crease (not allowed at the time).

It was conclusive.

 

[smytty]

Friedman will eventually post a picture from the review room to back up the call. It was offside. Relax.

 

[NeelyWasAWarrior]

I don’t have any dog in this fight as far as who wins.

Changing the course of a Cup clinching game over THAT is a disgrace to the league.

This rule needs to be gone at the next GMs meeting.

There's two sides to the coin though. Damned if you do, damned if you don't.

 

[Quinning]

That should have stood. Not conclusive enough to overturn.

 

[Bond]

Those kind of challenges are ruining my like of the NHL

 

[Ocoee]

I think the replay was inconclusive as well but Florida just got their 4th shot on goal 25 minutes into the game. They are choking bad

 

[Rygu]

Easy. You hate Tkachuk and Bennett.

Nope, I love Chucky, couldn't care less about Bennett.

 

[dhfa]

4 shots on goal. Cats just need to shoot it.

 

[trilobyte]

Easy. You hate Tkachuk and Bennett.

no, that would be me

 

[Chinaski89]

I’ve been out sick with pneumonia and the antibiotic caused an immune reaction in my system effecting my tendons and back so I’ve been able to watch every game this series… of course I return to work Monday night.

 

[HanSolo]

Why do they keep calling Broberg a revelation lol? He's been fine.