GDT: Sabres @ RANGERS | 7:00 PM ET - MSG

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Hey hey Ed! Are you one of "those" Ranger fans that actually want him? Would quickly dissipate our farm system/team AND deplete a ton of cash that we would have spent for re-signing necessary players. Oh well, to each his own.
It’s so tough for me. We’re talking about Jack Eichel here. This man is a monster and can potentially play much better. We’ve seen this trend happen before. When players leave Buffalo, they play better.

But then I really don’t know who to give up. I really love Lafreniere, Kakko, Kravtsov, and Lundkvist, but we’re not going to ice every single one of our prospects. We’re going to have to trade some eventually.

BUT then again, it’s way too early to give up on those guys and I want to see what they can turn into.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Larrybiv
That looked offside, but Buch brought his A-game tonight
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cmox
Stop capping. Just the other night, people were trashing him. Now you’re pretending like it never happened.
There’s a large difference between trashing Buch and saying that he isn’t a mandatory resign like some here think. Which two goals isn’t going to change that viewpoint.
 
What do you want to do instead? Play Fox for 60:00?

Real talk though, there’s a middle ground here, no?

Momentum is a huge part of hockey. The Rangers struggle enough with building on momentum in general. Why give further reason to struggle here?

Smith was atrocious on the first goal. Don’t bench him for the rest of the game. But don’t freaking play him literally on the exact sequence of events that he just screwed up on 2 minutes prior. Why play with fire?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Ad