I think they hold onto 3 of the 5 you mentioned. Kreider, Fast, and one of Nam/Spooner.Kreider, Namestnikov, Vesey, Fast and Spooner all headed for UFA in 2 years.
Also, I feel like Spooner will do well here, and people will come to like him. I have nothing to base this on other than a gut feeling.
Kreider, Namestnikov, Vesey, Fast and Spooner all headed for UFA in 2 years.
Also, I feel like Spooner will do well here, and people will come to like him. I have nothing to base this on other than a gut feeling.
Don't like this. He's someone who should be traded for futures at the deadline. Decent scorer, terrible shot numbers.
He still can be traded at the deadline this year, and with Hayes probably being trade at deadline it's a nice backup plan if the kids are overwhelmed in the NHL.Don't like this. He's someone who should be traded for futures at the deadline. Decent scorer, terrible shot numbers.
Don't like this. He's someone who should be traded for futures at the deadline. Decent scorer, terrible shot numbers.
That's true, obviously they can, but my point is I don't want him on the team next season, and if they don't he will still be here. I would have rather given him 1 year, that's all.They still can.
That's true, obviously they can, but my point is I don't want him on the team next season, and if they don't he will still be here. I would have rather given him 1 year, that's all.
Yes, I would rather take the risk of losing him for nothing than having his cap hit on the books, especially with the potential UFA's available.so if they can't trade him you would rather let him walk for nothing as a ufa instead of risking being able to trade him the following year?
You think his 4 million cap, with just an extra year, is going to prevent us from signing a UFA we really want, or trading Spooner if needed?Yes, I would rather take the risk of losing him for nothing than having his cap hit on the books, especially with the potential UFA's available.