enthuuusiast
Grossly Incandescent
He doesn't have to be generational, we need every scrap of talent we can get on this god forsaken roster.
If you can become the best goalscorer in the NHL ever this year or the next, how in the actual hell aren't you considered as generational player? Do you honestly believe your own bulls*t? Hilarious take.
Just because Crosby is generational doesn't exclude the fact that Ovie is that too. I mean the difference amongst Messi and Ronaldo is bigger imo and both are considered as generational talents and rightly so. The numbers they've produced at times when all opponents have been full time pro's in comparison with the old days?
If anything Ovies numbers are even more impressing than Gretzkys for me and this comes from a finn. He's played in a era with a lot better goalies and against a lot more even opponents with a considerably higher minimum level.
Please just stop that bogus already. It's like stating that Lemieux and Jagr weren't generational because they played at the same time. Lol!
At the end of the day, both Ovie and Crosby are better than every prospect playing now with McDavid as the only one possible to reach same heights even if he hasn't carried a lot of teams to gold. My point in this? This should open your eyes to the fact that both Ovie and Crosby are generational because history shows that it will be very difficult to achieve and repeat their success.
Like honestly, if you buy a game for an example? Say NHL, do you honestly think that only Crosby would be considered as generational? I mean no, nope, hell no, your statement is nothing but ridiculous. Ovie would probably and actually should be one of the best in a created game. Therefor he is... What? Generational. He will be far more remembered than others you consider as generational.
I mean it's consensus by now that Ovie is generational. But always entertained with your exaggerations and attempts to "Sell" your opinions and hot takes. Truly impressed.
I suppose this argument could be made merely looking at his statistical profile.
Both can be generational. Stats isn't everything and injuries play a part of course. I mean some players never reach their full potential because of injuries.I think Ovechkin is a generational talent, but I'm not sure how to define it. Stat compiling doesn't really do it for me, it's more of an eye test thing. I'd say a prime Eric Lindros was a generational player and I would take him 10/10 over Ovechkin, but he doesn't have the stats due to injury.
True. I would love Hagens with Michkov. God damn! The league needs this. Those eastern games would be much more exciting. Devils and Rangers, Bruins getting some competition from their close rivals wouldn't be bad for the league.Michkov dominating and Flyers sucking is probably the best case scenario for the Flyers this year. Let him eat, while everyone else falls apart enough where they could be in a position to snag Hagens/Misa/McQueen.
I disagree, raw point totals isn't the only thing that determines a generational prospect. He never had the elite athletic attributes (strength & speed) to be considered generational in today's NHL.Bedard is a generational prospect what is done once he is solidified as pro doesnt have any barring on that. If he lives up to the billing doesn’t change what he was as a prospect
You are so sensitive it’s actually pathetic
You don't consider Ovechkin as generational either...I disagree, raw point totals isn't the only thing that determines a generational prospect. He never had the elite athletic attributes (strength & speed) to be considered generational in today's NHL.
I'm hoping he tries out a longer stick. I think it will help his reach and being able to stand more upright.Tried to watch him most shifts last night and he’s fun to watch, going to be a pain in the ass to play against in the Metro for a long time. Also thought it was pretty ballsy/funny when he got into with Duhaime at the face-off circle, the kid’s got spunk which should endear him to Philly fans.
The only real negative I noticed was that he looks really small out there. He got knocked off the puck pretty easily and struggled along the boards. He’s a kid playing against grown men so it’s understandable but that was the only real thing negative that jumped out to me. He looked noticeably shorter than most guys on the ice as well.
The only real negative I noticed was that he looks really small out there. He got knocked off the puck pretty easily and struggled along the boards. He’s a kid playing against grown men so it’s understandable but that was the only real thing negative that jumped out to me. He looked noticeably shorter than most guys on the ice as well.
True. I would love Hagens with Michkov. God damn! The league needs this. Those eastern games would be much more exciting. Devils and Rangers, Bruins getting some competition from their close rivals wouldn't be bad for the league.
Yeah but its not a stretch to call Michkov a generational russian prospect , I mean this guy was already known at 15-16 in NA with people following his career , usually not the case for Russian Prospects but with the rise of social media maybe that has something to do with it as well. For example Demidov ( I know I know wrong thread ) Also had eyes on him at that age but nothing close to how known Michkov was at 15-16 overseasTough list, I'd probably put Ovechkin on that short list as well but I can respect that take either way. The generational term is thrown out way too much.
Yeah but its not a stretch to call Michkov a generational russian prospect , I mean this guy was already known at 15-16 in NA with people following his career , usually not the case for Russian Prospects but with the rise of social media maybe that has something to do with it as well
All my favorite prospects get drafted by rival teams, so you guys are getting Jimmy Hagens.Michkov dominating and Flyers sucking is probably the best case scenario for the Flyers this year. Let him eat, while everyone else falls apart enough where they could be in a position to snag Hagens/Misa/McQueen.
After last year's PP clownshow I didn't see this coming
View attachment 920847
As a prospect, sure, but when all is said and done it that label is earned be based on their actual performance in the NHL.
Michkov being perceived as a worse prospect than Celebrini doesn't mean much. Just like how Bedard was seen as a generational talent when he pretty clearly was not.
I was really hoping Zamula could figure it out but he’s actually so horrendous and so bad at making decisions it’s crazy lol, incredibly low IQ player.
Neither he or Bedard are going to be defensive players, the only way I’ve ranted about it, is Bedard, he’s allowed to cheat as a Center for more points / favorable breakouts but Michkov does it too at times, so it’s tit for tat can’t hate on either. They will have very similar rookie year stats the Flyers are a complete dumpster fire as are the Blackhawk’s