Arthur Morgan
Registered User
didn't stop Quebec from drafting LindrosI think Michkov probably told them not to draft him. Playing in Montreal isn’t for everyone.
didn't stop Quebec from drafting LindrosI think Michkov probably told them not to draft him. Playing in Montreal isn’t for everyone.
didn't stop Quebec from drafting Lindros
for sure. I mean even if Lindros would NEVER play for them. Drafting him was 1000000000% the right call. so trading Michkov could have likely gotten Reinbacher + alot more.This is exactly the analogy I tend to make for the Michkov situation and others like it. Not taking a guy because you're worried he might not be crazy to play for you is self-defeating. Especially when he's this good.
How do you know?This never happened.
Didn’t Friedman say he only wanted to play in certain markets? Michkov seemingly was already willing to tell certain teams that he didn’t want to play in their market, so why would it be a surprise if he said he didn’t want to play in French-Canada?I doubt it. I understand why he could tell something like this to Arizona which played in not that great hockey place. But Montreal is known as an absolute crazy hockey city, and it was what Matvei wanted, to play in a big hockey market.
So Arizona decided he wasn’t better than Simashev?didn't stop Quebec from drafting Lindros
While it's possible he could end up better then Bedard I'm not sure if what he is doing in the KHL is going to be a strong argument for that prediction if Bedard starts producing well as an 18 year old against men in the best hockey league in the world.This kid will be better than Bedard. That's my prediction.
What he's able to do against adults at 18 in the KHL has not been done before.
I submit that's overly optimistic; however, I never doubted that he would prove to be the second best player in the draft and not by a particularly wide margin.This kid will be better than Bedard. That's my prediction.
What he's able to do against adults at 18 in the KHL has not been done before.
I think Michkov probably told them not to draft him. Playing in Montreal isn’t for everyone.
well yes. you could be right...but bedard havent play against men yet...all those good shots are agains teenagers. and chicago is shitty team. in 1-2 years hes gonna be superstar for sure. this year..i dont know..Bedard has an absolutely insane shot even by NHL standards, great hands and he’s physically developed. Considering he will get all the ice time he wants, I would be shocked if he doesn’t score something like 30+30 this year
miss for Arizona as well, im not sure what they were thinking there, maybe Cooley is enough for them. I would have taken BPA it is what it is. no need to really get into this anyways.So Arizona decided he wasn’t better than Simashev?
It's reasonable to have that opinion. Neither player has distanced themselves from each other yet.Bedard did nothing to distance himself from Michkov. There’s nothing wrong with thinking Bedard will be the better player either.
Would have been so happy with a Jiricek + Michkov comboAlong with the Slaf pick lol but let’s see how that plays out
The release on the goal is great, although when he's shooting across his body he seems to have trouble releasing.I mean his release might be just a tad below Bedard’s
I'm sorry that I have to be the one but Bedard is on another level... It's not about Michkov. Bedard's shot is something we've never seen for someone his ageI mean his release might be just a tad below Bedard’s
Possibly, but let’s see it against NHL teams and goaliesI'm sorry that I have to be the one but Bedard is on another level... It's not about Michkov. Bedard's shot is something we've never seen for someone his age
From the past 20 years, do you think Ovechkin and Laine had comparable shots? What about Stamkos too?I'm sorry that I have to be the one but Bedard is on another level... It's not about Michkov. Bedard's shot is something we've never seen for someone his age