GDT: Roster Building XVIII: Trade Deadline Week!

  • PLEASE check any bookmark on all devices. IF you see a link pointing to mandatory.com DELETE it Please use this URL https://forums.hfboards.com/
Status
Not open for further replies.

A Star is Burns

Formerly Azor Aho
Sponsor
Dec 6, 2011
12,674
40,913
I’d rather just keep rolling with Daws instead of moving an asset for Jake Allen.
I believe the problem they've had is Daws was the only guy they were willing to play, they ran him into the ground a bit, and he suffered for it. So, Allen does make some sense from that perspective. But now they have a lot of decisions coming in the future with Schmid, Daws, Vanecek, Allen and likely interest in one of the big goalies that could shake loose in the summer.
 

DaveG

Noted Jerk
Apr 7, 2003
52,048
51,617
Winston-Salem NC
I'm sure they'll pursue a Markstrom or Saros type in the offseason still. Just seems like a weird move in the meantime, especially with a guy like Raanta for free.
Yeah I'm really confused as to what they're thinking here. Raanta is basically Glass Joe and he'd still make more sense than trading an asset for Allen since Allen has another year on his deal.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad