go to twitter.com, type 'projected lines strome fast panarin' in the search bar, and scroll down. You will quickly see that you are WRONG.Yes he has
go to twitter.com, type 'projected lines strome fast panarin' in the search bar, and scroll down. You will quickly see that you are WRONG.Yes he has
It’s up 0.02 goals per game vs last year.
I guess I could be wrong, but just saying... it seems like back in 2012 there were comparatively very few 70+ point players.
Now you can get all the way down into the 30's and 40's (in terms of rank) and find guys soaring past 70 points.
Edit: Double checking -- it jumped -- post-mini lockout in 13-14, there were anywhere between 17-19 players who scored 70 points in a season all the way through 16-17.
Then in 17-18, that number jumped to 36 players in an instant. In 18-19 it went to 55 players.
This year, it seems like it will be back into the high 30's or low 40's, but still, that's a huge jump from the mid point of the decade.
I wonder what caused that sudden shift.
I guess I could be wrong, but just saying... it seems like back in 2012 there were comparatively very few 70+ point players.
Now you can get all the way down into the 30's and 40's (in terms of rank) and find guys soaring past 70 points.
Edit: Double checking -- it jumped -- post-mini lockout in 13-14, there were anywhere between 17-19 players who scored 70 points in a season all the way through 16-17.
Then in 17-18, that number jumped to 36 players in an instant. In 18-19 it went to 55 players.
This year, it seems like it will be back into the high 30's or low 40's, but still, that's a huge jump from the mid point of the decade.
I wonder what caused that sudden shift.
go to twitter.com, type 'projected lines strome fast panarin' in the search bar, and scroll down. You will quickly see that you are WRONG.
It's the goaltender equipment change, 5v5 scoring rates have significantly increased.I think the rules (not being able to cross check the shit out of forwards) help scoring along with more penalties called. Reduction in goaltender equipment has to help as well.
I watched them all. Your memory is off.I dont have to, I have watched every game this year but 3.
Where does that screenshot show games played or TOI by combo?
Where does that screenshot show games played or TOI by combo?
You gave proof that the combo exists. That wasn't in contention.Come on man just admit you are wrong
You gave proof that the combo exists. That wasn't in contention.
Based on?It’s not the goalie equipment. The game has opened up tremendously. Teams just play a much more offensive style than they did 10 years ago. The players are more skilled than they’ve ever been lot of talent. Lot of scrubs no longer in the Lineups.
Hajek has to get up to 70 NHL games playedI thought that was the plan for Howden or Hajek
Look at all those times Fast wasn't on Panarin's line. There were games Strome wasn't even playing C. Who was, according to you- Fast?View attachment 329875
Need anymore research done to prove you dont know what you are talking about?
Look at all those times Fast wasn't on Panarin's line. There were games Strome wasn't even playing C. Who was, according to you- Fast?
Based on?
I think it's pretty clear that the new equipment rules introduced in 17-18 are the main driver. Powerplay opportunites aren't up and neither are expected goals, it's just shooting percentages that suddenly increased and the stayed the same in subsequent years (with the same equipment rules).
View attachment 329877
Give it up....you are making yourself look foolish. Panarin played most of the year with Fast. Zibanajad, Strome or Chytil centered Panarin all year with Strome being his most used center.
If your chart is percentages, then it definitely says that Panarin did not play "most" of the year with Fast. It says that the most common lineup for Panarin was Panarin, Strome, and Fast, but that was still only 38.5% which is less than a majority. But there are almost no other combinations that have Fast with Panarin according to that chart, while Panarin is with Strome on almost every other combination.
Looks to me that based on those charts Panarin was with Strome significantly more than he was with Fast.
You can't read charts, its obvious.
You mean we can’t read screenshots of charts with some values cut off?You can't read charts, its obvious.
Mmmm, I can read charts.... I just asked if that one was percentages.
What is it that you think that chart says?
Also.... rude.
You mean we can’t read screenshots of charts with some values cut off?