Based on the back-to-backs in the schedule, Igor's injury, and Alex's play.Based on what though?
Based on the back-to-backs in the schedule, Igor's injury, and Alex's play.Based on what though?
Thoughts on trading (Jacob) Trouba/(Alexandar) Georgiev to Buffalo for their 1st and 2nd (or 3rd) round picks, assuming the cap is the same? I think it’s beneficial and fair for both sides. — Danny
Sorry, can’t agree with your premise. Management is seeking to solidify this group and put the Rangers in position to make a run at the Cup over the next two to three years, not to stockpile draft picks. And the Sabres are seven-deep on defense, so I can’t envision Buffalo being interested in Trouba, whom the Blueshirts are in no hurry to deal.
I don’t know. I think Strome to an extent will depend on his expectations for his next contract and his market value. If he prices himself out, they may feel like they can do better with Chytil and giving a chance to someone like Granlund/HaulaIgnoring this horrific trade proposal in the question, this snippet from Larry's latest mailbag isn't surprising
The clock to win started the minute Kreider signed his new deal. And also probably means Strome is sticking around which sucks lol
If Strome prices himself out, I would imagine Granlund and Haula would be as well. These guys are all in a similar categoryI don’t know. I think Strome to an extent will depend on his expectations for his next contract and his market value. If he prices himself out, they may feel like they can do better with Chytil and giving a chance to someone like Granlund/Haula
Individual considerations for individual players. I wouldn’t mind trying Galchenyuk on a 1-year show-me.If Strome prices himself out, I would imagine Granlund and Haula would be as well. These guys are all in a similar category
So let Chytil take another stab at 2C, the Galy/Haula/Granlund will be insurance/depth.I don't think Granlund or Galchenyuk have played center in a long while.
Rangers dont need no defensive guys like that are soft or injury prone no thanks to Galy or Haula or Granlund. i rather have someone like Barron if signs to win a spot or try to sign a player from overseas that is in their prime or on the young side like when they signed Georgiev as an UDFA maybe a kid like Richards wins the 4th line spot who knows. .So let Chytil take another stab at 2C, the Galy/Haula/Granlund will be insurance/depth.
Rangers dont need no defensive guys like that are soft or injury prone no thanks to Galy or Haula or Granlund. i rather have someone like Barron if signs to win a spot or try to sign a player from overseas that is in their prime or on the young side like when they signed Georgiev as an UDFA maybe a kid like Richards wins the 4th line spot who knows. .
id love Barkov and wait until he is UFA or wait until he forces a trade to NYR. hope he was a Rangers fan as a kid. he can mentor KakkoGoing from being a UDFA to an NHL player would be quite the jump.
I don't know how they'd fit him in or if it would even be possible, but Barkov would be optimal.
Going from being a UDFA to an NHL player would be quite the jump.
I don't know how they'd fit him in or if it would even be possible, but Barkov would be optimal.
Rangers dont need no defensive guys like that are soft or injury prone no thanks to Galy or Haula or Granlund. i rather have someone like Barron if signs to win a spot or try to sign a player from overseas that is in their prime or on the young side like when they signed Georgiev as an UDFA maybe a kid like Richards wins the 4th line spot who knows. .
id love Barkov and wait until he is UFA or wait until he forces a trade to NYR. hope he was a Rangers fan as a kid. he can mentor Kakko
K'Andre Miller + conditional 2ndHow are we trading for Barkov while losing zero players off our roster?
How are we trading for Barkov while losing zero players off our roster?
If thats to me, Strome isnt on the roster, and I didnt list any defense, goalies, or picks
How are we trading for Barkov while losing zero players off our roster?
K'Andre Miller + conditional 2nd
I am not saying that they are the same person, just that no one has ever seen them in the same place at the same time.At this point, I'd rather have Webster back than Zucc.
That was never in doubt. That is what a rebuilding team does.The Rangers made the RIGHT choice by moving on from him.
Are you proposing that they buy him out?Henrik in a backup role making $8.5 mil is bullshit anyway.