Not trading Strome for a 2nd or two.Who do we like from Ottawa? Or is it just picks? They got plenty of 2nd rounders.
Are you saying there is no other way to be good besides overpaying on Goodrow?
I mean I think most owners want to be good now, and good if not great later.
I think given the Rangers current roster a good GM could actually make the playoffs, and improve the team beyond for several years that without needing to overpay for UFAs.
Who do we like from Ottawa? Or is it just picks? They got plenty of 2nd rounders.
Because that same team could sign him and the Bolts get nothing?In all honesty, I think Tampa would have been better off letting Goodrow walk than acquiring a 7th round pick. Why would you give a future, competitive, in-conference team rights to a player who can shut down your offensive talent?
I fail to see why can't they do both?The Rangers need to find their Benoit Pouliot and Dominic Moore, not overpay a guy by 50-100% just because he was the third while on a great line on a championship team.
Of course it's not the only way to be good. It may be the quickest and the easiest, getting a guy that checks a lot of the boxes they are looking to get ticked in one swoop. But if the goal is to set yourself up to have the best possible peak a couple years down the road, Goodrow at this price point falls short.Are you saying there is no other way to be good besides overpaying on Goodrow?
I mean I think most owners want to be good now, and good if not great later.
I think given the Rangers current roster a good GM could actually make the playoffs, and improve the team beyond for several years that without needing to overpay for UFAs.
Because one of those things would be detrimental.I fail to see why can't they do both?
Vince did write in that article that the Rangers wouldn't mind playing him at center.I’m curious if the Rangers are going to use Goodrow if signed as the 3C. That would be worth a little more in cap. Something like Kreider-Goodrow-Kravtsov
At the same time, letting go of Pouliot for $4.5m was a bad move. He exceeded that value on Edmonton according to bang for buck analytics. Edmonton was just a shit team.The Rangers need to find their Benoit Pouliot and Dominic Moore, not overpay a guy by 50-100% just because he was the third while on a great line on a championship team.
Because one of those things would be detrimental.
In all honesty, I think Tampa would have been better off letting Goodrow walk than acquiring a 7th round pick. Why would you give a future, competitive, in-conference team rights to a player who can shut down your offensive talent?
"Dolan is a genius for talking down Goodrow to only a 15% share of the Madison Square Garden Company."By Wednesday, we'll be saying "Anything less than 7 years $5M a year for Goodrow without NMC on his final year will be fantastic"
how long do you want to wait ? when is it okay to start looking elsewhere to upgrade the team?As much as I despise the Eichel idea, if his cap hit is only 5.5-6M more than Goodrow's
And the Rangers are not going to wait on their other prospects development anyway....