Speculation: Roster Building Thread XII

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
In all honesty, I think Tampa would have been better off letting Goodrow walk than acquiring a 7th round pick. Why would you give a future, competitive, in-conference team rights to a player who can shut down your offensive talent?
 
Are you saying there is no other way to be good besides overpaying on Goodrow?

I mean I think most owners want to be good now, and good if not great later.

I think given the Rangers current roster a good GM could actually make the playoffs, and improve the team beyond for several years that without needing to overpay for UFAs.

Yeah, I've said it before - the trick is to find the Goodrows and Colemans before they are the big names. The Rangers are currently in a situation where they need to improve the bottom 6 and add more grit, but creating an anchor contract (or several) to do so is not the smart way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ola and Off Sides
I can't remember the last time I've seen a longer term deal for a third liner work out. Those 'guys you win with' are no longer that when they're making 4, 5, 6 million. Clarkson, Brouwer, Sutter, etc. These deals always suck by year 2.

You need to develop these guys young, eventually let them go, and replace them from within. Or in Tampa's case, add them after literally everything else is in place and let them go.
 
Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but the Rangers are competing for the Stanley Cup not the Salary Cap Cup.

Absolutely, you have to be smart, and do the best you can with the constraints of the league. At the same time, every good team is in cap hell.

The league is designed that way. Cap hell and being bad are your choices. There isn't a middle ground.

More and more teams are going to start "cheating." I don't think it's gonna work but Montreal tried to pull shit with Price, that's obvious.

You have to overpay players and then purge to win the Stanley Cup. That's why the overall quality of teams is down, which I complain about all the time.

This is the league the owners wanted and it's the league we play in. We don't get a choice. Just be thankful they keep Arizona around solely to dump cap onto.

We have a two year window before Kreider develops a "rare illness" and we should take advantage of it.
 
I’m curious if the Rangers are going to use Goodrow if signed as the 3C. That would be worth a little more in cap. Something like Kreider-Goodrow-Kravtsov
 
Are you saying there is no other way to be good besides overpaying on Goodrow?

I mean I think most owners want to be good now, and good if not great later.

I think given the Rangers current roster a good GM could actually make the playoffs, and improve the team beyond for several years that without needing to overpay for UFAs.
Of course it's not the only way to be good. It may be the quickest and the easiest, getting a guy that checks a lot of the boxes they are looking to get ticked in one swoop. But if the goal is to set yourself up to have the best possible peak a couple years down the road, Goodrow at this price point falls short.
 
The Rangers need to find their Benoit Pouliot and Dominic Moore, not overpay a guy by 50-100% just because he was the third while on a great line on a championship team.
At the same time, letting go of Pouliot for $4.5m was a bad move. He exceeded that value on Edmonton according to bang for buck analytics. Edmonton was just a shit team.

We never replaced anything that he or Hagelin did to this day.

And then the team rebuilt and traded every vet contract anyway so what did it matter?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gardner McKay
In all honesty, I think Tampa would have been better off letting Goodrow walk than acquiring a 7th round pick. Why would you give a future, competitive, in-conference team rights to a player who can shut down your offensive talent?

Because a team in the conference or division can sign him and Tampa gets nothing.
 
As much as I despise the Eichel idea, if his cap hit is only 5.5-6M more than Goodrow's

And the Rangers are not going to wait on their other prospects development anyway....
 
Not to mention that the team is taking steps toward trying to develop their own. Both the Cuylle and Berard picks in last year’s draft were efforts in that direction. I imagine we’ll see more on Fri/Sat.
 
As much as I despise the Eichel idea, if his cap hit is only 5.5-6M more than Goodrow's

And the Rangers are not going to wait on their other prospects development anyway....
how long do you want to wait ? when is it okay to start looking elsewhere to upgrade the team?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad