Gardner McKay
RIP, Jimmy.
Its going to be a long offseason...
Hold Lafreniere at gunpoint and make him watch a Power Point presentation called, “The Magic and Mystique of Playing Right Wing”.
@McRanger92 you said in the last thread: Im talking about roster construction, I'll care about matchups and D pairs more when the season is starting. The team needs puck movers, Zac Jones is literally a free puck mover. He deserves a shot. The rest is irrelevant until September.
It is absolutely relevant bc trouba is going to still be a top4 here over schneider and will continue to play against the better players on other teams while schneider mans the 3rd pair with selective minutes. like i said posts ago if you want to try jones and commit to him for the season on the 3rd pair and then make an upgrade at the deadline if needed that is fine, whatever, but this whole thing started bc you want to trade lindgren so you can move miller up with fox and play jones with trouba. that was your stated plan. i am simply saying that asking jones to walk in and play in a top 4 role with a d man that is typically eating minutes against the other teams best players is setting up jones to fail. it is what bad management does. and this again takes us back the the same core question: if you trade lindgren who is playing top 4 ld and filling that hole? wat does the player cost in assets? what is his cap hit? where are you finding this player?
That's too much for Mikkola, and he shouldn't be in the top 4 either...especially with TroubaMiller-Fox
Mikkola (3 x 2.5M)-Trouba
Jones-Schneider
Harpur
Use Lindgren to add speed to the forward group.
That's too much for Mikkola, and he shouldn't be in the top 4 either...especially with Trouba
He absolutely did not. That pair was serviceable. It was not a top nhl pair.Mikkola was perfectly fine when he was playing with Fox. Certainly better than he looked with Schneider. The guy can handle a bigger role.
so take our 3ld that was a mess in the series and struggled with extended big minutes, and elevate him to the 2nd pair, LOVE IT!!!Miller-Fox
Mikkola (3 x 2.5M)-Trouba
Jones-Schneider
Harpur
Use Lindgren to add speed to the forward group.
mikkola didnt have to transition the puck when he was with fox bc that is what fox does. trouba doesnt transition the puck, that is what miller did on that pair. putting two guys together that dont transition the puck is a bold strategy Cotton...Mikkola was perfectly fine when he was playing with Fox. Certainly better than he looked with Schneider. The guy can handle a bigger role.
You had me sold at “hold Lafreniere at gunpoint.”Hold Lafreniere at gunpoint and make him watch a Power Point presentation called, “The Magic and Mystique of Playing Right Wing”.
He's not a top 4 dman. He's a fine cheap 3rd pairing dmanMikkola was perfectly fine when he was playing with Fox. Certainly better than he looked with Schneider. The guy can handle a bigger role.
He's not a top 4 dman. He's a fine cheap 3rd pairing dman
Trocheck and Panarin just don’t work well at all together. They both produce because they’re talented, but they don’t have chemistry.
so take our 3ld that was a mess in the series and struggled with extended big minutes, and elevate him to the 2nd pair, LOVE IT!!!
mikkola didnt have to transition the puck when he was with fox bc that is what fox does. trouba doesnt transition the puck, that is what miller did on that pair. putting two guys together that dont transition the puck is a bold strategy Cotton...
All we are saying is give jones a chance
It’s funny you say that, because during the season I kept thinking that Panarin doesn’t fit.Trocheck and Panarin don’t work well together
Zibanejad and Panarin don’t work well together
Chytil and Panarin don’t work well together.
What’s the common denominator here?