Speculation: Roster Building Thread V (2021 Offseason) - Hold them horses, only 45 days left until the draft!

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Danault the player could be a good idea (even if I am not sold on it), the contract attached will be a bad idea.

Panarin, Trouba, Kreider, Danault, at like 32-34M in cap space for the next 4-5 years is brutal.
 
Danault the player could be a good idea (even if I am not sold on it), the contract attached will be a bad idea.

Panarin, Trouba, Kreider, Danault, at like 32-34M in cap space for the next 4-5 years is brutal.
It’s only brutal if they don’t perform. Kreider is the one of those four that I would be most worried about
 
Danault the player could be a good idea (even if I am not sold on it), the contract attached will be a bad idea.

Panarin, Trouba, Kreider, Danault, at like 32-34M in cap space for the next 4-5 years is brutal.

i wouldn’t put Panarin in that group lol
 
It’s only brutal if they don’t perform. Kreider is the one of those four that I would be most worried about

he likely will be overpaid but he’s got a skill set none of our other forwards have and he’s going to be good for 25 goals if he gets ice time even if it’s 3rd line and PP
 
he likely will be overpaid but he’s got a skill set none of our other forwards have and he’s going to be good for 25 goals if he gets ice time even if it’s 3rd line and PP
Kreider will be the next buy out. No way he finishes that contract. Don’t see how he makes it past Lafreniere’s ELC at the maximum
 
Kreider will be the next buy out. No way he finishes that contract. Don’t see how he makes it past Lafreniere’s ELC at the maximum

probably because at the time they didn’t expect to get Lafraniere. Now they have Panarin and Lafraniere at LW but while he’s here I expect he will produce
 
probably because at the time they didn’t expect to get Lafraniere. Now they have Panarin and Lafraniere at LW but while he’s here I expect he will produce
Of course, but they will need the cap room. At that point. Heck they need the cap room now
 
Of course, but they will need the cap room. At that point. Heck they need the cap room now

I mean as of now Fox is the only one getting paid well out of the kids. I expect they will but the kids have to produce to be worth a big deal when it’s time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: haveandare
I mean as of now Fox is the only one getting paid well out of the kids. I expect they will but the kids have to produce to be worth a big deal when it’s time.
Roster then may not be the same as the roster now. Rangers are going to need most flexibility
 
It’s only brutal if they don’t perform. Kreider is the one of those four that I would be most worried about
Kreider is what he is, how had that not been determined. Trouba same thing.

There is no upside there that we have not seen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Avery16
I think Trouba is a significantly better bet than Kreider going forward
Even if, he is still the #2 RD behind Fox.

These are secondary players who carry pretty big cap hits, with clauses, Danault will also be a secondary player.

Rangers signing more secondary players with a flat cap that some suggest may last for the next 3-4 seasons is not a good idea.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NYRangers16
I could absolutely see danault being a 20 point defensive specialist before long
Maybe? But at least he would still be contributing defensively, Faceoffs, PK, etc.

If Kreider isn’t the good version of Kreider he is offering nothing. Danault is still useful if his offense drops off
 
Maybe? But at least he would still be contributing defensively, Faceoffs, PK, etc.

If Kreider isn’t the good version of Kreider he is offering nothing. Danault is still useful if his offense drops off

No he's not. If Danault signs for 6M and the offense falls off he is not useful. He may be a good defensive player but he's a massive detriment to the team with that kind of salary then.
 
No he's not. If Danault signs for 6M and the offense falls off he is not useful. He may be a good defensive player but he's a massive detriment to the team with that kind of salary then.
It’s not a detriment if his is contributing defensively. Not saying I would sign him (I’m not sure yet) but he plays a playoff style game. The Rangers do not have those players.
 
  • Like
Reactions: wafflepadsave
He turned down 6x5 from Montreal. Doesn't mean he wouldn't accept the same, or less, from another team.
That's wishful thinking. Especially in a league that puts a premium price on centers with recency bias. Multiple teams will bid on him.
 
Even if, he is still the #2 RD behind Fox.

These are secondary players who carry pretty big cap hits, with clauses, Danault will also be a secondary player.

Rangers signing more secondary players with a flat cap that some suggest may last for the next 3-4 seasons is not a good idea.

It's a really bad idea. You pay the 3C shut down C half, or less, of what Danault is going to demand at most. The team is not going to be able to fill every position with a $6M player.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Off Sides
Wouldn't Stastny due to age, flat cap etc cost less than Danault (especially long term) and he does kind of the same things? He's 35 but that could help the young kids and give more time to evaluate Chytil? just throwing that out there too
35... and there's been chatter on this board about acquiring him for nearly a decade...!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad