BBKers
Registered User
Last thread is at 1.473 posts. So I started a new one. Have at it!
Can we steal Trotz from the Isles please?
The Islanders play a really intelligent and hard working brand of hockey. They're giving the B's all they can handle and, if they move on, will do that against any opponent in the league.
So was watching a clip from the steve dangle podcast, and they mentioned the flaws of the leafs this year. Where after getting bullied in the playoffs the previous year they decided to add "tuffness" and then promptly couldn't score.
That actually illustrates a really good point. The ideal is a guy who plays hard, hits, but also scores. Those guys are rare and expensive. If we go all in on this toughness concept and acquire players who add toughness but limited scoring ability, similar to what the leafs did. We may end up handicapping ourselves. We've got kids who if coached properly should have no problem playing a physical game. The problem is we dont know if either Gallant or Tocchet will teach that.
I know that everyone wants to talk about how we need to add toughness, and I dont think thats really the point. Look at Tampa, they've got an insane amount of skill, not a ton of guys who are really big outside of their defensemen, and yet they look like they could coast to the cup.
Colorado is actually the better example, their top line is full of high skill guys, who are just not afraid to play in tight. We have a bunch of high skilled guys who aren't afraid to play in tight. We just need to encourage that play from the kids. Yes we have some perimeter players, but we have more guys who are capable, both in terms of size and skill to drive to the net.
Watching the series between the Islanders and Bruins to me really exposes the weaknesses the Rangers need to address. Its not only the style of play but also the type of players they have. Both are good coached teams but to me the biggest difference is that these teams can play a number of ways but they a bunch of grinders if need be. Both teams have a couple of good centers on their first 2 lines but the ones manning the 3rd and 4th lines also play a good grinding game you need to win in this league. Zibs may be flashier but he can't play the 2 way type of game most of these guys can. Same for Strome and FC. Sorry but it is reality. We really need to make changes in the middle otherwise we will not be competitive even if by chance we slide into a playoff spot.The Islanders play a really intelligent and hard working brand of hockey. They're giving the B's all they can handle and, if they move on, will do that against any opponent in the league.
I don't think the guys you mentioned are a problem and I would expect at least 3 of them to continue to get better although not totally convinced on Chytll. I think the bigger problem is getting some better rounded players, particularly in the middle to help in their progress. Need some grit and less Flash.Also guys like Kakko, Laf, Kravtsov, Chytil etc are 19-21. They could and likely will be playing very differently in a few years than they do now especially if they buy into the coach.
Why?
He’s torts with out the attitude.
So was watching a clip from the steve dangle podcast, and they mentioned the flaws of the leafs this year. Where after getting bullied in the playoffs the previous year they decided to add "tuffness" and then promptly couldn't score.
That actually illustrates a really good point. The ideal is a guy who plays hard, hits, but also scores. Those guys are rare and expensive. If we go all in on this toughness concept and acquire players who add toughness but limited scoring ability, similar to what the leafs did. We may end up handicapping ourselves. We've got kids who if coached properly should have no problem playing a physical game. The problem is we dont know if either Gallant or Tocchet will teach that.
I know that everyone wants to talk about how we need to add toughness, and I dont think thats really the point. Look at Tampa, they've got an insane amount of skill, not a ton of guys who are really big outside of their defensemen, and yet they look like they could coast to the cup.
Colorado is actually the better example, their top line is full of high skill guys, who are just not afraid to play in tight. We have a bunch of high skilled guys who aren't afraid to play in tight. We just need to encourage that play from the kids. Yes we have some perimeter players, but we have more guys who are capable, both in terms of size and skill to drive to the net.
I don't think the guys you mentioned are a problem and I would expect at least 3 of them to continue to get better although not totally convinced on Chytll. I think the bigger problem is getting some better rounded players, particularly in the middle to help in their progress. Need some grit and less Flash.
Mika when he’s on plays a solid 2 way game. A lot of his lapses this year are likely due to covid. Once you could see his recovery we saw a huge jump in his defensive game.They need a better defensive version of Strome. A guy who puts up .86ppg is fine for a 2C. However he’s not great defensively and abysmal on face offs and has no grit. it’s also why I’m hesitant on Eichel because he plays similar to Zibanejad (finesse, E/W, flash, skill, etc)
How can we get Courtier? haha
A hyper correction via a coach is fine. having a couple players on the fourth is fine.No doubt, our weakness in this area was magnified this year due to playing NYI, WAS and co so much.
But I still think a lot of it comes from having team toughness and we just mailed it in in that department. To restore that we just need a hyper correction next year. I am definitely far from sold on that we need to be able to go toe to toe with the more physical teams beyond that. But we can’t let these teams completely stomp on us again next year…
So was watching a clip from the steve dangle podcast, and they mentioned the flaws of the leafs this year. Where after getting bullied in the playoffs the previous year they decided to add "tuffness" and then promptly couldn't score.
That actually illustrates a really good point. The ideal is a guy who plays hard, hits, but also scores. Those guys are rare and expensive. If we go all in on this toughness concept and acquire players who add toughness but limited scoring ability, similar to what the leafs did. We may end up handicapping ourselves. We've got kids who if coached properly should have no problem playing a physical game. The problem is we dont know if either Gallant or Tocchet will teach that.
I know that everyone wants to talk about how we need to add toughness, and I dont think thats really the point. Look at Tampa, they've got an insane amount of skill, not a ton of guys who are really big outside of their defensemen, and yet they look like they could coast to the cup.
Colorado is actually the better example, their top line is full of high skill guys, who are just not afraid to play in tight. We have a bunch of high skilled guys who aren't afraid to play in tight. We just need to encourage that play from the kids. Yes we have some perimeter players, but we have more guys who are capable, both in terms of size and skill to drive to the net.
So was watching a clip from the steve dangle podcast, and they mentioned the flaws of the leafs this year. Where after getting bullied in the playoffs the previous year they decided to add "tuffness" and then promptly couldn't score.
That actually illustrates a really good point. The ideal is a guy who plays hard, hits, but also scores. Those guys are rare and expensive. If we go all in on this toughness concept and acquire players who add toughness but limited scoring ability, similar to what the leafs did. We may end up handicapping ourselves. We've got kids who if coached properly should have no problem playing a physical game. The problem is we dont know if either Gallant or Tocchet will teach that.
I know that everyone wants to talk about how we need to add toughness, and I dont think thats really the point. Look at Tampa, they've got an insane amount of skill, not a ton of guys who are really big outside of their defensemen, and yet they look like they could coast to the cup.
Colorado is actually the better example, their top line is full of high skill guys, who are just not afraid to play in tight. We have a bunch of high skilled guys who aren't afraid to play in tight. We just need to encourage that play from the kids. Yes we have some perimeter players, but we have more guys who are capable, both in terms of size and skill to drive to the net.
I think you’re missing that our kids are really those “tough to play against” types of players. They just need seasoning. none of our kids aside from fox and Jones are really undersized.Strongly disagree with this, at least that they did this with any sort of consistency last season. I agree that getting "tougher" in a classic sense should not be a priority - though if it comes with an otherwise good player, it is a bonus. I do however think that the NYR need to diversify their lineup and get "tougher to play against" specifically by developing the ability to play a grinding game when called upon. Tampa for example can absolutely do that, it's what makes them so hard to beat.
That dimension is IMO what the 2021 NYR were really lacking and gets exposed in certain types of games and/or against certain types of opponents. Can that improve with a coaching change? I think and hope so. But I think there is a need to switch up some skill sets as well.
They could have hired him instead of QuinnCan we steal Trotz from the Isles please?