Krams
Registered User
- Feb 13, 2012
- 8,042
- 1,982
Previous thread: Speculation: - Roster Building Thread: Part XXXVI
Reading Carp's article and comments in the athletic and hes really on the sign panarin train.
I've been reading some other material here on HF. Some are under the mindset that since the Rangers have a lot of wingers, we won't draft Kakko. I say this not to get the board worked up (because I don't believe it for a second), I say it because it is funny how some fan bases are convincing themselves that this is a possibility. Thankfully ours never does that![]()
Something like that.You mean like how Pittsburgh passed on Crosby because they had Malkin?
Reading Carp's article and comments in the athletic and hes really on the sign panarin train.
Not terribly surprising. Does anyone think Reporters love covering the Rangers in their current state, with no free agent signings, no playoff battles, and no real emerging stories?
Watching a rebuild where kids come along slow but steady can be difficult for the average fan, let alone someone who has to make their living writing about it.
Just like Lundqvist is adjusting to the success level of what this team, the reporters who follow it have to adjust tooNot terribly surprising. Does anyone think Reporters love covering the Rangers in their current state, with no free agent signings, no playoff battles, and no real emerging stories?
Watching a rebuild where kids come along slow but steady can be difficult for the average fan, let alone someone who has to make their living writing about it.
I could see it. Their pitch is probably going to be along the lines of building not only a special team, but building a fan base and community for hockey down there, and the owner has clearly shown he’s willing to spend the money to do itWith the Quenneville signing in Florida, I'm starting to believe the Panarin/Bobrovsky package deal is likely to happen. Q coached Panarin, that team has some good pieces and who doesn't love some tax-free money while living in beautitful Ft. Lauderdale?
Chicago's board right after the lottery was saying there's a chance we go off the board because we love being the smartest team in the room....like there has been much of a sample to go by with us drafting at the top of the draft in the past 50 years...I've been reading some other material here on HF. Some are under the mindset that since the Rangers have a lot of wingers, we won't draft Kakko. I say this not to get the board worked up (because I don't believe it for a second), I say it because it is funny how some fan bases are convincing themselves that this is a possibility. Thankfully ours never does that![]()
Yeah. Like I said, I've been doing a lot of reading around HF as a whole. The hot takes on what we will do have been... borderline hilarious.Chicago's board right after the lottery was saying there's a chance we go off the board because we love being the smartest team in the room....like there has been much of a sample to go by with us drafting at the top of the draft in the past 50 years...
I think a lot of people interpret getting the 2nd overall as meaning Kreider is for sure gone - I think it is the opposite. I think there is an even greater chance that he stays now. It curbs our need to trade off even more assets. I also think it allows us to deal somethjng we would have used as a building, say the 37th overall, for a piece like Adam Fox - that is by definition acceleration of the rebuild.
If no changes are made except contract extensions, draft picks, and Fox, then we’d be looking at:
Kreider Zib Buch
Chytil Strome Kakko/Kravstov
Lemiuex Andersson Kravstov/Kakko
Vesey Howden Fast
Names? Nieves? Pionk? Someone would have to be moved, no?
Skjei DeAngelo
Staal Fox
Hajek Shattenkirk
Lindgren, Miller, Lindqvist, Barron, Rykov, and other picks all in the pipeline
I've been reading some other material here on HF. Some are under the mindset that since the Rangers have a lot of wingers, we won't draft Kakko. I say this not to get the board worked up (because I don't believe it for a second), I say it because it is funny how some fan bases are convincing themselves that this is a possibility. Thankfully ours never does that![]()
They could write about other stuff, like the prospects, the cap, different contract levels, expansion, the next CBA.
Heck they could write about how they were wrong when they pimped up the last several UFAs the Rangers signed and how that did not lead to exactly what they thought it would.
Chicago fans?I've been reading some other material here on HF. Some are under the mindset that since the Rangers have a lot of wingers, we won't draft Kakko. I say this not to get the board worked up (because I don't believe it for a second), I say it because it is funny how some fan bases are convincing themselves that this is a possibility. Thankfully ours never does that![]()