jay from jersey
Registered User
- Jan 30, 2008
- 6,383
- 4,726
I'd rather trade Chytil 1 for 1 for a right winger. Centers aren't cheap and I think that's a battle that is going to have be fought in the offseason. Just roll with Goodrow or Barron as centers on that line. Hopefully Chytil can bring back someone with a bit more skill to that 2 RW slot than Hunt. If the RW Chytil brings in a trade has a good season with Panarin then we've recouped some value if we need to replace Strome next season. Chytil's value is going to drop even lower if they continue to play him on wing especially with how bad our centers are at playing center.
I think Barron is going to thrive at the 3rd line position next season. Especially flanked by Goodrow and say, Blais. That line has size, will hit, and can score.
Eventually down the line have
Goodrow/Blais-Barron-Cuylle line would also do damage, but that’s too far down the road.
Barron is the type of player like William Carrier, or Stephenson ( though not as gifted offensively). Guys that are very smart that have solid tools that Gallants going to get the best out of and put into a position to succeed.
I think he fits the mold of what Gallant want more from his bottom 6. Chytil suffers from going back and fourth from being an 2-3 tweener that plays a grinding N/S type game. He’s still developing.
Maybe he does turn into Lars Eller type with a little more offense down the line. But I dont think with our cap situation, his contract status, Barron coming up, and the likely need for an immediate upgrade on 2C, hopefully a Larkin type somehow, chytil makes it past this season as a ranger.
I hope Barron gets some games this season. He deserves it. I also what to see if he can build/has and chemistry with certain players.
I don’t get why they are playing McKegg, etc.
I guess they really only play to play Barron if they are short and center and don’t want him bouncing for wing to center.
It’s just makes so much more sense to me to integrate a guy like Barron who you know is coming next season and is part of your future, opposed to a journeyman.
Even if Barron doesn’t play well for a 3-4 game call up, at least you reward him for his play in Hartford and give him something to strive for and work harder.
For me, I’d want to gauge how far my future contributor is coming along as opposed as just wasting a spot on McKegg whose likely not going to be here next season.
Last edited: