brakeyawself
Registered User
- Oct 5, 2006
- 1,600
- 943
The New York - Boston rivalry exists is basically every sport except hockey and it annoys me. They had a great opportunity to build one last season but now we go back to the old divisions again.
Also, 8-team divisions suck.
Yup. 100%
And if they were going to do the 8-team model, putting 4 of the 6 original 6 in the same division just so dumb. Aside from the rivalry factor, I think it just would have made more sense to put 2 in Metro, 2 in Atlantic, 2 in Central. Those teams are also some of the most recognized and followed teams by fans outside of their cities and globally. It would have kept 1 major rivalry each per those divisions, and established a bit of franchise parody as far as hockey interest. I guess the Pacific would have been left out of that, but that's fine, they could have worked it out. They would have had the Calgary/Edmonton rivalry, both those teams with Vancouver which is usually decent, then a Seattle v Vancouver thing should probably emerge as well. And they would have had the 3 Cali teams, which, on it's own has varying degrees of interest. But I think all combined it would have been fair for each division and those fanbases, along with spreading the fair weather fans around better, who tend to mostly know the original 6 and maybe another dozen clubs well.
Ah well. That Atlantic division going to get so much more attention now I think than all the other 3 divisions. Just from the hockey world lens.