Shesterkybomb
Registered User
- Dec 30, 2016
- 17,660
- 19,369
A. Which other GM said this? There are many of us, not just a few, many of us who wanted a different player at that spot and lo and behold, the player we wanted has turned out better.
Does that make us savants worthy of a scouting job? No, but it does mean the Rangers were off on that one. Shit happens, people miss on players all the time, they're human, which means that they can, and sometimes, are wrong.
B. This organization is hopelessly devoted to Staal. They moved a superior player to forward for most of the season just so that there was a spot for him to play. They continued to send him out there no matter how bad he was. I haven't seen him called out once for his performance outside of being benched for 3 games (which really looked like a move to try and wake the team up more than it was about sitting a player who doesn't deserve to play.)
C. My opinion is backed up with a ton of evidence. Its not like I want the player to suck, I would much rather him be as good as you and the front office/coaching staff think that he is.
Goawaystaal, what you’ve just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.