IDvsEGO
Registered User
- Oct 11, 2016
- 5,493
- 5,634
Depends on what the return is?What's the likely purpose of whatever deal? Saving money for the TDL?
Even if it’s just getting rid of trouba it might be addition by subtraction
Depends on what the return is?What's the likely purpose of whatever deal? Saving money for the TDL?
Both would require either salary coming back or retention. Guessing it’s a player for player trade. Lots of interesting options on both of those teams.Nashville and Detroit make the most sense as trade partners imo
Ok, so why not complain then? Drury NOW is making up for it. Would you rather he not get rid of Trouba now?
deadline deals he has been ok.i think of Drury as doing well in most trades.
The Nemeth trade was expensive because we wanted that D. Who we lost to waivers later.
Both would require either salary coming back or retention. Guessing it’s a player for player trade. Lots of interesting options on both of those teams.
Ok, so why not complain then? Drury NOW is making up for it. Would you rather he not get rid of Trouba now?
My dark horse is Chicago. Fired the coach yesterday and have loads of cap space.Nashville and Detroit make the most sense as trade partners imo
Both would require either salary coming back or retention. Guessing it’s a player for player trade. Lots of interesting options on both of those teams.
Ideally 4-5this cannot be the only move though.
at least one, ideally two more players have to go.
My guy, I've been complaining about it for a while now, as posters here can attest to.
he makes 8 million dollars to be a bottom pair defenseman on a good day. Also has made it known there are very few places he would be willing to play for. What GM in their right mind would give up assets for him?waivers would be so lame dude. I get it but like, damn we can't get anything for him?
Well I'm presuming it won't be a like for like deal.Depends on what the return is?
Even if it’s just getting rid of trouba it might be addition by subtraction