Speculation: Roster Building Thread - Part XIII (Nanaki edition)

IDvsEGO

Registered User
Oct 11, 2016
5,298
5,277
Not specifically responding to you, but to me, it usually takes five guys to make a play other than having Connis McDavies or Nethan MacKinson skate through everyone and set up one of his boys.

Also, @Maliks PlusMinus in shambles now.
Georgiev in Colorado is having one of the absolute worst seasons. He’s not stopping shots.
Does that mean that the players in front of him are at fault? Because they’re letting easy shots get off.

Plus minus is worthless.
 

SA16

Sixstring
Aug 25, 2006
13,958
13,758
Long Island
Georgiev in Colorado is having one of the absolute worst seasons. He’s not stopping shots.
Does that mean that the players in front of him are at fault? Because they’re letting easy shots get off.

Plus minus is worthless.

What if they are at fault considering his backup has a save percentage within .001?
 

will1066

Registered User
Oct 12, 2008
48,599
68,174
Georgiev in Colorado is having one of the absolute worst seasons. He’s not stopping shots.
Does that mean that the players in front of him are at fault? Because they’re letting easy shots get off.

Plus minus is worthless.

Yeah, I understand your point. It's a fair point. I don't think it's so black and white, though. Georgiev is a special case. You have six guys (including the goalie) play or not play cohesively as a group and that results in a plus or minus. Majority of the cases it's not one guy. Yeah, sometimes Miller will cough up a puck in front of the the net for a GA, but most of the time, it's lack of dzone coverage that exposes Igor, etc. I also think Igor giving up soft goals is a symptom of mental exhaustion from being constantly bombarded because the guys in front of you refuse to defend.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Pawnee Rangers

IDvsEGO

Registered User
Oct 11, 2016
5,298
5,277
Yeah, I understand your point. It's a fair point. I don't think it's so black and white, though. Georgiev is a special case. You have six guys (including the goalie) play or not play cohesively as a group and that results in a plus or minus. Majority of the cases it's not one guy. Yeah, sometimes Miller will cough up a puck in front of the the net for a GA, but most of the time, it's lack of dzone coverage that exposes Igor, etc. I also think Igor giving up soft goals is a symptom of mental exhaustion from being constantly bombarded because the guys in front of you refuse to defend.
The problem is that you are correct, there are 6 guys on the ice, each one has to do a job to prevent the goal.
One guy crazy bad at his job can easily lead to a goal. Why do the other 5 get a demerit for doing their job effectively.
That’s why plus minus is bad.

Yes goals against are bad.
Goals for are good.

Now isolate it.

What does it look like w different d pairs,linemates.
What does it look like with different goalies.

And now we’re building actual metrics.
 

RangerBoy

Dolan sucks!!!
Mar 3, 2002
45,196
22,423
New York
www.youtube.com
I read in The Athletic Pavel Mintyukov has struggled this season. The Ducks are a mess. Zegras stinks. Zegras is a center and Cronin plays him on the wing. MacTavish stinks. Vatrano's stock was dropped like a stone. Three goals. He was the answer to unlocking Mika and Chris. Vince Mercogliano's favorite player ever.

Any insight from Leonardo67 regarding Minty?

Minty was a very good player last season.

Thinking of potential Miller trades. Minty would be an interesting player.
 

effen

Registered User
Feb 3, 2018
9,953
9,532
I read in The Athletic Pavel Mintyukov has struggled this season. The Ducks are a mess. Zegras stinks. Zegras is a center and Cronin plays him on the wing. MacTavish stinks. Vatrano's stock was dropped like a stone. Three goals. He was the answer to unlocking Mika and Chris. Vince Mercogliano's favorite player ever.

Any insight from Leonardo67 regarding Minty?

Minty was a very good player last season.

Thinking of potential Miller trades. Minty would be an interesting player.
That kind trade is possible only if Anaheim decides to accelerate things a bit. Paired with a vet forward move.

If too many guys are struggling they'll just keep sucking though.
 

noncents

Registered User
Feb 25, 2022
1,821
2,248
Yeah but that's also not what play-driving means, and I'm sorry if I wasn't clear on the term.
i saw you having a discussion centered on the term play driving, i knew you both had different definitions, so i pointed it out.

as far as kakko being analytics darling - he's not, and i didn't say he was. He is analytically, a defensive whiz, but he's been middling offensively.

Let's throw out his first year, yes? As you said about Cuylles rookie year (when he was years older than Kakko was as a rookie) - it's intellectually dishonest to assume there will be no development. He was put in a bad spot with a bad coach. The sample since then, in my opinion, is large enough to show that the rookie year was an anomaly.

A discussion of his metrics since then i think should center on what I have maintained is his major flaw - a lack of flexibility in play. He wants to play one way, namely by possessing the puck, cycling down low, and kind of just holding it until the perfect setup play materializes. This works well with other players game for that style, but not with rush-centric offensive players. He can't adapt to that style well at this level.
 

IDvsEGO

Registered User
Oct 11, 2016
5,298
5,277
i saw you having a discussion centered on the term play driving, i knew you both had different definitions, so i pointed it out.

as far as kakko being analytics darling - he's not, and i didn't say he was. He is analytically, a defensive whiz, but he's been middling offensively.

Let's throw out his first year, yes? As you said about Cuylles rookie year (when he was years older than Kakko was as a rookie) - it's intellectually dishonest to assume there will be no development. He was put in a bad spot with a bad coach. The sample since then, in my opinion, is large enough to show that the rookie year was an anomaly.

A discussion of his metrics since then i think should center on what I have maintained is his major flaw - a lack of flexibility in play. He wants to play one way, namely by possessing the puck, cycling down low, and kind of just holding it until the perfect setup play materializes. This works well with other players game for that style, but not with rush-centric offensive players. He can't adapt to that style well at this level.
I think that’s actually not true. he’s mostly played with chytil and laf throughout his career, Chytil can play downlow but he’s mostly a rush centric player. Laf just adjusts to what’s needed.
 

will1066

Registered User
Oct 12, 2008
48,599
68,174
The problem is that you are correct, there are 6 guys on the ice, each one has to do a job to prevent the goal.
One guy crazy bad at his job can easily lead to a goal. Why do the other 5 get a demerit for doing their job effectively.
That’s why plus minus is bad.

Yes goals against are bad.
Goals for are good.

Now isolate it.

What does it look like w different d pairs,linemates.
What does it look like with different goalies.

And now we’re building actual metrics.
Too deep a rabbit hole. Plus minus is an antiquated metric and I wouldn't be surprised if it's phased out eventually. It's a yesteryear indicator that was meant to be glanced and not dissected.
 

noncents

Registered User
Feb 25, 2022
1,821
2,248
Chris Kreider has entered his random diffuse back pain arc. He’s toast
leaking this actually a brilliant subtle way to ensure he's not traded. nobody would trade fair value for a 34yo guy who relies on physical tools that has known back issues.

it's like troubas "will refuse to report" in that it tanks his trade value, but it won't make him a pariah among fans. he even couches it in an assortment of flummeries about playing through distractions, it's just hockey, etc.
 

effen

Registered User
Feb 3, 2018
9,953
9,532
Metrics are overrated, all you need is Grits/60.

leaking this actually a brilliant subtle way to ensure he's not traded. nobody would trade fair value for a 34yo guy who relies on physical tools that has known back issues.

it's like troubas "will refuse to report" in that it tanks his trade value, but it won't make him a pariah among fans. he even couches it in an assortment of flummeries about playing through distractions, it's just hockey, etc.
He was very, very specific with it too. Not just one part of his back, apparently everything, all year.

Kreider leaning into his finesse game, against both players and GMs.
 

noncents

Registered User
Feb 25, 2022
1,821
2,248
I think that’s actually not true. he’s mostly played with chytil and laf throughout his career, Chytil can play downlow but he’s mostly a rush centric player. Laf just adjusts to what’s needed.
i disagree about Chytil. He is an excellent puck carrier, but he doesn't score just off the rush. He scores off of cycle plays.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mxyxptlk

duhmetreE

Blessed Bigly
Sponsor
Jan 18, 2012
34,566
52,525
I would be all in on mintyukov.

He will drive people on here f***ing nuts but his skill set and raw ability are high level. Needs some work but he’s got everything you want in an elite rover type defenseman.
I was looking at top young LHD

it'd have to be a KAM+Kreider type deal. or maybe sucker someone into thinking Lindgren is a great player.

Even Carolina with Nikishin... Kreider+KAM would be tempting for them. We'd have to take back Orlov+ or something



Is it too much to ask to have defenseman that can retrieve pucks and make a good decision/1st touch?

Being mobile might be asking for too much....

I read in The Athletic Pavel Mintyukov has struggled this season. The Ducks are a mess. Zegras stinks. Zegras is a center and Cronin plays him on the wing. MacTavish stinks. Vatrano's stock was dropped like a stone. Three goals. He was the answer to unlocking Mika and Chris. Vince Mercogliano's favorite player ever.

Any insight from Leonardo67 regarding Minty?

Minty was a very good player last season.

Thinking of potential Miller trades. Minty would be an interesting player.
Mika, Kreider and Lindgren
for
Zegras and Mintyukov

throw in tuba @ 50% #discountedleadership
 

effen

Registered User
Feb 3, 2018
9,953
9,532
If you're looking to make a Miller trade for kiddos it's gotta be for a young team who wants to level up now.

Ottawa and Utah are the two. Everyone else is too young/old/already contending/tanking/fake record (Calgary).
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad