We had a better second half of the first against the devils also. I agree the starts have been troubling, but to me it’s not a clear coaching issue - people just start from not liking the coach (partial with good justification) and then filter everything they see to justify that conclusion.
A coach’s job is to organize the strategy and manage the execution of it best they can. There’s nothing about the first few minutes of a game that is more coach dependent than any other part of the game. And the fact is, this league isn’t bad - you can’t expect to clearly win entire games start to finish more than a handful of times a year. Why is it that the starts in particular are a problem for this group? I’m not sure but it’s been a problem since before Quinn, no?
The TDA scratch for the second game I totally agreed with - you need to set boundaries for a young team and show consequences for selfish moves that cost the team. The second game scratch would have been understandable if we had 6 other serviceable D, but since we don’t, it was stupid imo. Smith is way better than JJ and TDA is way better then both.
Starting a goalie after a shutout when it’s not back to back games is not weird or unjustifiable in any way imo. Talbot used to get games after he’d play really well when Hank could have started instead. It happens and it’s not some bizarre choice, especially against a team that isn’t known for being an offensive powerhouse.