Here we go baby
Kreider - Zib - Laf
Panarin - Stroganov - Buch
Giuseppe - Chytil - Kakko
Lemieux - Howden - Gauthier
Lindgren - Troube
Miller - Fox
Johnson (i guess) - Tony D
Lol Stroganov?
More like Blowganov.
Here we go baby
Kreider - Zib - Laf
Panarin - Stroganov - Buch
Giuseppe - Chytil - Kakko
Lemieux - Howden - Gauthier
Lindgren - Troube
Miller - Fox
Johnson (i guess) - Tony D
Panarin says what can only be described as a 'I don't hate Strome' comment to a member of the media (praise was for Buch, not for Strome), suddenly on HF Boards: "Strome is Panarin's Personal Pick".Just shows what i been saying, everyone can hate on quinn for playing Strome with Panarin but it never occurs to anyone that maybe Panarin likes playing with Strome.
its obvious that Quinn loves Strome, he's like a Howden, Sr. He's going to have a much longer leash.
I dont care how well Smith played one game ago- this team does not owe him a damn thing.I dont hate it, smitty deserves a spot though.
The idea that Smith who has been really solid, is coming out of the line-up is asinine.
Also, if the simple fact is that we are all going to have heart attacks every time Zibanejad takes a fall, then he needs to be traded now and a replacement should be sought after.
Mika will be fine.
they won’t move Gavrikov unless they have to. The kid is a legitimate shutdown D. His edge work is fantastic and he takes the body. He also is pretty quick. I’d love to have him.
to get PLD rangers are more then likely going to have to send
-Chytil
-Strome(mostly salary purpose and placeholder for Chytil)
- 1 of Lundkvist, Robertson, Jones, etc I don’t think they would make Schneider available and odds are the jackets will want a cost controlled top 4 D to insulate themselves in case Jones or werenski pull the same shit as PLD or just flat out leave in 2 years in free agency. I think it would be Lundkvist.
1st round pick.
so the question is would you guys pull the trigger on this???
Chytil
Strome
Lundkvist
1st
for
PLD
that’s a lot to give up. Chytil could very well turn out to be a similar player. But PLD is an elite 2c now and has room to grow and a history with Panarin. Me personally, I would pull the trigger, and I’m probably higher on Chytil than most. He’s got size speed and talent. Lundkvist for sure will be a binaries top 4 D for them for many years. Rangers have an abundance of RD and can take the hit there. And the jackets could get another impact forward or D in the mid to late 1st which is most likely where the rangers pick would be. What does everyone think?? What would you do?
Exactly what you proposedthey won’t move Gavrikov unless they have to. The kid is a legitimate shutdown D. His edge work is fantastic and he takes the body. He also is pretty quick. I’d love to have him.
to get PLD rangers are more then likely going to have to send
-Chytil
-Strome(mostly salary purpose and placeholder for Chytil)
- 1 of Lundkvist, Robertson, Jones, etc I don’t think they would make Schneider available and odds are the jackets will want a cost controlled top 4 D to insulate themselves in case Jones or werenski pull the same shit as PLD or just flat out leave in 2 years in free agency. I think it would be Lundkvist.
1st round pick.
so the question is would you guys pull the trigger on this???
Chytil
Strome
Lundkvist
1st
for
PLD
that’s a lot to give up. Chytil could very well turn out to be a similar player. But PLD is an elite 2c now and has room to grow and a history with Panarin. Me personally, I would pull the trigger, and I’m probably higher on Chytil than most. He’s got size speed and talent. Lundkvist for sure will be a binaries top 4 D for them for many years. Rangers have an abundance of RD and can take the hit there. And the jackets could get another impact forward or D in the mid to late 1st which is most likely where the rangers pick would be. What does everyone think?? What would you do?
We had a better second half of the first against the devils also. I agree the starts have been troubling, but to me it’s not a clear coaching issue - people just start from not liking the coach (partial with good justification) and then filter everything they see to justify that conclusion.I think he is talking more along the lines of, that quinn never has this team ready to start games. We were NOT ready at all for the 1st game of the season which goes to coaching. The 2nd game i missed bc of football but i know we won decisively, but i believe that win had more to do with the embarrassing fashion in which they lost. then game against the devils we were again NOT ready to start the game. The Rangers may have outshot the devils but WE were outplayed at least in the first period.
Part of Quinn's job is to have this team prepared to start the season and each game. This team has not been ready to start any game so far this season.
The other parts have to do with Jack Johnson still being in instead of getting deangelo back in the lineup and putting your number 1 goalie (shesty) back in for the devils game even though georgiev had a good game against the islanders. These are mostly young inexperienced players and he needs to show that he has his players back and he is not doing that. These are just some of the things that i have seen from quinn in the past few seasons.
I dont care how well Smith played one game ago- this team does not owe him a damn thing.
Gauthier gets so little ice time and manages to generate a good scoring chance by himself at least once a game. I'm not blown away by him or anything, but why isn't he getting a look this year?
Panarin says what can only be described as a 'I don't hate Strome' comment to a member of the media (praise was for Buch, not for Strome), suddenly on HF Boards: "Strome is Panarin's Personal Pick".
Ya thats what he said "i don't hate strome". Funny stuff.
Reading apparently is not your strong suit.You prefer Johnson....got it
How good does a 700k, 25 year old RHS depth D have to be to spend nothing in acquiring him?
So we're playing Smith, Johnson or Bitetto instead, none of which are RD. Got it.Considering we do not need that, more than hes worth
on what planet should johnson be playing over smith? this is why tony's "accountability" is bullshit.Vince Z. Mercogliano
@vzmercogliano
Today's D pairs Lindgren - Fox, Miller - Trouba, Johnson - DeAngelo. Smith and Hajek are also practicing and rotating in.
on what planet should johnson be playing over smith? this is why tony's "accountability" is bullshit.
on what planet should johnson be playing over smith? this is why tony's "accountability" is bullshit.
Johnson deserves an extended look unlike others