Speculation: Roster Building Thread: Part LXXIV

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Oh good, those lines work for both sides because what I’m told by CBJ fans is that we have to add to Kakko to get him.
They tell me PLD is William Wallace,Gretzky, Messier, with a slight touch of Jesus mixed in on the main boards. So it’s Kakko plus plus
 
They tell me PLD is William Wallace,Gretzky, Messier, with a slight touch of Jesus mixed in on the main boards. So it’s Kakko plus plus

It’s pretty amazing. It’s likely the opinion of just a small, vocal minority, but Kakko is “not close” to PLD?

The same guy was then turning around suggesting Norris + Logan Brown + one other asset would be a fair deal.

If Gorton traded Kakko for that package he’d be fired on the spot.

Absurd.
 
What is Kreiders value now in next trade window our new 1st pick LW need ice time at least Alexis Lafrenière
is from Canada, they know to play hockey over there.:DD
 
I see a bit of arguing about the usefulness of Ryan Strome and that’s all fine and good, but let’s not let it distract us from the fact that the Rangers are -4 with Deangelo in the lineup and +5 without him.
 
I see a bit of arguing about the usefulness of Ryan Strome and that’s all fine and good, but let’s not let it distract us from the fact that the Rangers are -4 with Deangelo in the lineup and +5 without him.
Yes. Also, Smith and PDG are PPG players at this point in the season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bl02
I see a bit of arguing about the usefulness of Ryan Strome and that’s all fine and good, but let’s not let it distract us from the fact that the Rangers are -4 with Deangelo in the lineup and +5 without him.

giphy.gif
 
It’s pretty amazing. It’s likely the opinion of just a small, vocal minority, but Kakko is “not close” to PLD?

The same guy was then turning around suggesting Norris + Logan Brown + one other asset would be a fair deal.

If Gorton traded Kakko for that package he’d be fired on the spot.

Absurd.
Id say a fair assessment of HF boards is 95% of users are nowhere close in their trade predictions and value of certain players in the trade market.
 
You aren't getting Dubois without giving up Chytil (unless you trade away a premium prospect like Kakko or Lafreniere).

The package will include Chytil and then some. Buchnevich+Chytil+Robertson/Kravtsov+2022 1st

Meh.

I still feel like we could have paid way less than that to get up in the draft from 22 to get Lundell; and that we should have.
 
They tell me PLD is William Wallace,Gretzky, Messier, with a slight touch of Jesus mixed in on the main boards. So it’s Kakko plus plus

In fairness, while Kakko may have a higher ceiling than pld, he’s certainly far less proven right now.

Not saying I’d like that trade, but it’s a not unrealistic price.
 
PLD is great, he'd fit in here really well...

I'd wait that one out though. I want to see what Chytil does over a full season. He probably won't be as productive as PLD, but if you can get most of PLD's production at half the price, that upgrade doesn't become necessary.

A disgruntled Eichel? Different story.

Eichel is a 1C and worth those assets for sure. PLD is not.
 
I also think that if the Rangers land PLD it's because they see him as the heir to Zibanejad, not a guy who slots in behind him for the next 7 years. You don't put 3-4 pieces on the table for a high end #2 center. Especially when you have enough firepower on the wings to prop up a passable pivot like Strome.

If you move Chytil for PLD, you're probably looking at trading Zibanejad for a Chytil++ in the near term. Shuffling the pieces around to add a high-end center who can possibly produce like Zib but is heading into his prime as opposed to his 30's.

Prefer Eichel in this approach
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fitzy
I don't see how you can keep Mika past two years. If there's an opportunity to get an Eichel, or maybe PLD, who are much younger, you need to go with the younger guy. I don't see paying Mika well into his 30s. With the dead money going away and Smith's contract ending you could get one year with Mika AND his replacement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mas0764
Facts are lazy. I know, you don’t like the ones that don’t fit your narrative. Strome is a bad hockey player, but don’t let those pesky facts get in the way.

Yup bad hockey players generally get top 6 mins, PP time, pk time and 9 mill over 2 years. Strome eats your hate for breakfast and craps out 20 mins a game just for your viewing pleasure.
 
I don't see how you can keep Mika past two years. If there's an opportunity to get an Eichel, or maybe PLD, who are much younger, you need to go with the younger guy. I don't see paying Mika well into his 30s. With the dead money going away and Smith's contract ending you could get one year with Mika AND his replacement.
Throw barkov into the mix as well
 
I think people are out to cancel him but David Quinn isn’t one of them.
No one's out to "cancel" him, stop this playing the victim bullshit. He played like trash and then became a distraction and got disciplined for it and it worked for the Rangers in the critical next game. This no different than Trotz calling out Clutterbuck for not controlling his shot in warm up.
 
No one's out to "cancel" him, stop this playing the victim bullshit. He played like trash and then became a distraction and got disciplined for it and it worked for the Rangers in the critical next game. This no different than Trotz calling out Clutterbuck for not controlling his shot in warm up.

Not sure you read what I wrote based on your response.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad