Totally fair and I am ok with the trade especially with what it looks like we have in Nils. I would not have extended McD anyway considering our rebuild/contending timeline and he seemed to be breaking down a bit.
At the time I was hoping we would get a bit more for McD/Miller combo but would have to say it's probably a trade both teams did well with.
I tend to view trades through two prisms: Value at the time, and long-term value.
Value at the time tends to focus more on fair market price and whether I feel that was met, exceeded, missed, etc. It doesn't necessarily evaluate whether the trade was a success, but whether it reasonable.
Long-term value tends to focus on the results meeting, exceeded or under-performing compared to expectations. This can also vary based on the perceived value of the trade.
To the former, I think the Rangers got fair value for what they gave up.
To the latter, the jury is still out for me. I think Miller gave value to Tampa as an asset, more than a player. McD has his ring, but he has it with some interesting context attached to it.
Howden is not likely to hit the more optimisitc hopes for his talent, and is at a bit of a crossroads as to what type of player he is going to become. Hajek, to me, has a lot of work to do become an NHL player. Lundkvist could be the long-term gem of this trade, but we'll have to see how his potential translates. Henriksson is intriguing, if a little bit of a mystery box for me.
Namestnikov did not have the impact the Rangers hoped for. But, can that be salvaged if the Rangers use his return to find a valuable asset in the 2021 draft?
About 30 months later, I don't know if either team quite got what they hoped for out of the deal --- and yet both teams are arguably better off for making the deal.