Speculation: Roster Building Thread: Part LXVIII

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
on the plus side that’s mad balance. On the downside there’s almost no chance that all those combinations find chemistry.

well in this setup I think the RWs are pretty much interchangeable, for one.

OTOH why wouldn't they any more than any other combo find chemistry?

You give David Quinn way too much credit.

20-93-89
10-16-24
13-72-12

he does not have that much creativity. Also, Strome might be anemic away from Panarin.

No, it's just what I'd do. Obviously not the plan.
 
I don’t seen the point of moving Buch out and Kreider to RW if it makes the bottom six worse by proxy.

Either way Strome needs to be the first domino to fall. Once the Rangers know what to do with Strome, they will have a better idea of how to assemble this.

I don’t hate the idea of 11F/7D at this point either. A lot to figure out though.

hence “like” Kreider and that means others too have to fill the void. Kreider to RW i’m guessing is only so Laf plays on line two. Buch at 25 yrs of age could be in position for a significant raise. Cap position looks better yet i’m not sure if Buch is long term. Kraskov needs future position.

Lot of players competing for positions.
 
Kreider has played enough right wing that they know he can, also, he best get used to it because if not he's gonna be looking at 3rd line duties with Lafreniere and Panarin on the left side. I think the fact that someone is gonna have to change sides is the biggest reason for not signing Fast imo.

agree +1
 
Lemieux.

I'd say Kreider could probably do that a bit more, but I feel like it's been somewhat phased out of his game.

I've always been somewhat surprised that Lindgren doesn't end up in more scraps than he does.

Smith has elements of that in his game.

Never been Kreider's role and I don't think anyone wants Kreider to start now while he's still in top-6.

I wouldn't mind Lemieux (and it would add a dimension to his contribution) but again - it hasn't been his role yet.
 
Guys I just wanted to assure everyone LAFRENIÈRE Mika Kreider line is dominant. Just proved in on NHL21 case closed

Is NHL 21 worth it this year? I stopped buying NHL games since I think NHL 14 or 15. I feel like maybe it's been long enough that it would feel "new".
 
well in this setup I think the RWs are pretty much interchangeable, for one.

OTOH why wouldn't they any more than any other combo find chemistry?

Well we know KZB works and we know Panarin-Stome works. Since your lineup has neither there are more question marks around compatibility.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ranger Spice
Is NHL 21 worth it this year? I stopped buying NHL games since I think NHL 14 or 15. I feel like maybe it's been long enough that it would feel "new".

NHL 14 was the last good NHL game in the series, NHL 21 is better than last years edition, EASHL got much better
 
I don’t think Kakko looked good with Chytil at all. And vice versa . I don’t like them together.

Well, luckily Chytil and Kakko are still very very young, I just think it's unfair to close the book on that experiment.

I also think Laf paired with one of them on his line would possibly help boost either Chytil or Kakko into that next level.

These combos are going to be so much fun to watch, I believe that. Too much skill all over.
 
I don’t think Kakko looked good with Chytil at all. And vice versa . I don’t like them together.
I have only see Chytil look good with Kreider. No one else. Kakko...it is hard for me to think of what his best spot is. Ideally you want to get him on a line he can drive and cook a bit on, but yeah. I hated him with Chytil and I wouldn’t put him with Lafreniere either. Maybe Kakko is the one that should be on the first line? Hard to say.
 
This idea that Laf shouldn’t be with Zibby because it puts too much pressure on him misses the point - that being to have 3 good lines. If you are designing lines like teams did in the 90s then that’s different. But arguably having Panarin on one line, and Zibby as a second and then ?-Chytil-Buch/Kreider on the 3rd gives us 3 quality lines to roll with
 
This idea that Laf shouldn’t be with Zibby because it puts too much pressure on him misses the point - that being to have 3 good lines. If you are designing lines like teams did in the 90s then that’s different. But arguably having Panarin on one line, and Zibby as a second and then ?-Chytil-Buch/Kreider on the 3rd gives us 3 quality lines to roll with
Are you saying that you can’t have three good lines unless Lafreniere is with Zibanejad?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad