- Jul 16, 2005
- 14,857
- 13,012
Two things
1- I get the feeling Carolina is becoming the Bruins. Adding Fast will be a headache. They’re a good team and their kids are maturing.
2 - the Rangers might take a step back. Yes, they actually got younger. With so many kids i think they need to push them into development and a Fast would be taking ice time takes away from that development.
Keeping Fast would have made the team better yet i’m not sure keeping him would have the difference. Yes, Carolina took a step forward and the Rangers took a step back IMO. I think Carolina is primed to surge while the Rangers are at least a year away. I think two years and beyond we’re going to be in really good shape.
I see very little chance that this team misses the playoffs with Panarin, Zibanejad, Kreider, Buch, Strome, Kakko, and even Lafreniere and Chytil spilling out of their top 6. And that's not even to mention the possibility of contributions from players like Gauthier, Howden taking a step forward, or Kravtsov making the leap. And with Shesterkin in net and a defense that can push the puck with probably nearly any team in the league.
Actually defending will remain a big problem until some of the left side D prospects become NHLers, but I don't think anyone is visualizing a team without holes that is ready to compete right now. But a lot of mediocre teams make the playoffs and the Rangers are absolutely not going to be mediocre when it comes to putting pucks in the net.
But if we do miss the playoffs and have one more sell off at the deadline (Strome, Buch, possibly ADA, possibly Georgiev), I won't complain.
Find that future center. Seems like a lot of D in the top 10, but a lot of Centers in the 10-15 range (McTavish, Sillinger, Johnson, Dean, Beniers, Eklund). So no lottery win required.
Last edited: