Thirty One
Safe is safe.
- Dec 28, 2003
- 28,981
- 24,357
Was he the one with the nunchaku?People want to trade for a perfect 2C carved by Michaelaneglo
Was he the one with the nunchaku?People want to trade for a perfect 2C carved by Michaelaneglo
He was the one with snakes for hair I thinkWas he the one with the nunchaku?
“There are better options out there for the money and the assets it would require to get him”
WhY dOeS eVeRyOnE *HATE* mOnAhAn??
This idea that Laf shouldn’t be with Zibby because it puts too much pressure on him misses the point - that being to have 3 good lines. If you are designing lines like teams did in the 90s then that’s different. But arguably having Panarin on one line, and Zibby as a second and then ?-Chytil-Buch/Kreider on the 3rd gives us 3 quality lines to roll with
Maybe I missed it. I haven’t seen anyone say anything worse than he isn’t a good enough return for what Calgary is rumored to be seeking from us, and is overpaid for what he does. What have you seen?Sorry, problem?
It seems as though the topic of him as player is quiet divisive here, cost aside.
If Laf is staying LW I don't see our lines being Panarin-Strome-Kakko & KZBline chemistry is an unpredictable thing - lines don't carry over month to month, let alone year to year. when they do, it's precious. they'll work themselves out, and are very unlikely to 'work' via force feeding.
i think KZB is gonna do ~all the heavy lifting and Panarin-Strome are gonna take soft matchups, at least for the first part of the year. I'd be pretty shocked if Laf wasn't on the 3rd line when games start up again.
it's a valid criticism considering he doesn't PK, is not a matchup player, and is terrible defensively. I don't wanna say he's redundant but he certainly doesn't add anything we don't already have.Who gives a shit if Monahan is a product of gaudreau he’d becoming here to play with panarin who is even better...people act like we’d be putting him on a line by himself
Well if we’re trading the best offensive-defenseman we’ve had in 20 years then yeah, lol.People want to trade for a perfect 2C carved by Michaelaneglo
Monahan is basically Ryan Strome, coming at the expense of Buchnevich or DeAngelo? Which would leave our RW depth as Kakko-Kravtsov-Gauthier. Not good.Who gives a shit if Monahan is a product of gaudreau he’d becoming here to play with panarin who is even better...people act like we’d be putting him on a line by himself
Because if that’s the case why not just stick with Strome and keep DeAngelo?Who gives a shit if Monahan is a product of gaudreau he’d becoming here to play with panarin who is even better...people act like we’d be putting him on a line by himself
Because if that’s the case why not just stick with Strome and keep DeAngelo?
Also the fact Strome is proven to have that chemistry with Panarin, Monahan might not. Not every player clicks with every player.Because if that’s the case why not just stick with Strome and keep DeAngelo?
I don't hate Monahan, I think the Rangers are going into a big transition year as is, may as well see what shakes out before making bigish trades etc. Also given the uncertainty around the season(covid), expansion, and the amount of cap space they gain next off-season... I think they can make more informed choices as those things get figured out.
He’s a better version of Strome.*because he is better than strome...anyone saying he is basically strome has no idea what they are talking about
because he is better than strome...anyone saying he is basically strome has no idea what they are talking about
He’s better than Strome, but we can still do better for that cap hit or less.because he is better than strome...anyone saying he is basically strome has no idea what they are talking about
I don't hate Monahan, I think the Rangers are going into a big transition year as is, may as well see what shakes out before making bigish trades etc. Also given the uncertainty around the season(covid), expansion, and the amount of cap space they gain next off-season... I think they can make more informed choices as those things get figured out.
Haha. That really is a great point. We can't draft one and we certainly suck at signing one.Transition year.. You mean doing nothing to improve the team?
We gonna continue to wait until we can't afford Zbad's next contract?
I'm not saying we're gonna be contenders but how about we start filling in the pieces to the puzzle already?
Still forever waiting for a 4th line center..
Transition year.. You mean doing nothing to improve the team?
We gonna continue to wait until we can't afford Zbad's next contract?
I'm not saying we're gonna be contenders but how about we start filling in the pieces to the puzzle already?
Still forever waiting for a 4th line center..
I thought Fontaine had the potential to be a top notch 4th line center in the Dominic Moore mold. I guess he jus never put it all togetherDoes Fontaine have any NHL potential? I remember people saw him as a bit of a dark horse a while ago. Could he be a late bloomer?
We don’t have a time machine so how do suggest the Rangers accelerate youth? Emerging stars and “ still forever waiting forth line center”? That’s the focus or complaint during a pandemic and flat cap which is crippling other orgs while the Rangers rebuild is loaded?
Really?