If Kreider’s money isn’t on the books, who are they signing to replace him? Who is going to provide that same level of play that he offers? The speed that keeps the opposition honest? The net front presence on the PP? Forget the other things like leadership and tenure in this organization, which he does provide. Forget even the physical play and size he offers. What is all that money allowing you to do this offseason that you cannot do with him on the books? Or even next offseason in which more money comes off the books. You weren’t going to roll out another young guy to the already extremely young team to replace Kreider. So who were you planning to sign that offers all that? I don’t see Kreider’s contract as a hindrance, with or without Lafreniere. I don’t see a quality replacement. There is something to be said about having someone who has been around the organization for more than a few years.
Who said that money has to be used this off season? We’re not contending next year. Kreider will be on the books every year. I’d rather have the cap space overall, not to spend this summer. Nothing you’re saying is wrong, but 7M is a lot and we’ll have plenty of big contracts to give out over the coming years. Not remotely comparable, and not that great of an option, but I’d rather sign a guy like Maroon for 1M for net front presence and leadership than have Kreider until 36. Again, I’m not disagreeing at all with what you’re saying and I’m positive the Rangers were thinking along the exact same lines when he was signed. Obviously unexpectedly cashing in on a potential franchise altering #1OA and getting saddled with 3 years of flat cap makes hindsight a whole different ballgame.
Last edited: