Speculation: Roster Building Thread: Part LXVII

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Wouldnt mind Rutta or Hamonic. But doubt Hamonic comes back to the East.

Absolutely not to Ceci. And Vatanen just does nothing for me. His defense is lacking and Offense has regressed with age.
Rutta is perfectly fine with me. Not advocating for Ceci just reading the names.
 
Deangelo can't play defense in sheltered minutes on his natural side, what makes you think he will be better on his off side vs the best in the league?
And that certainly crossed my mind. What is the alternative though? Johnson? Smith? Definitely do not want to break up Lindgren-Fox if anything because of balance. I totally get where youre coming from, but I dont see a better option at this present time.

You also do that hoping DeAngelo drives possession, certainly more than Hajek/Skjei/Smith ever did next to Trouba, and then Trouba makes up for the defensive side of things
 
  • Like
Reactions: EdJovanovski
Deangelo can't play defense in sheltered minutes on his natural side, what makes you think he will be better on his off side vs the best in the league?
I don’t think he can, but it’s something Rangers are looking at so doesn’t hurt to look at some options. I still think Johnson is going to play a lot of minutes. I also think Lindgren and Fox might wind up as top pair.
 
it would be poetic justice if after last years show me deal ( and having to play with marc staal), ADA switches sides and has another monster year.

if he goes to arb. and gets his 5 mil, it may look like a bargain.

the guy is saying all the right things re. moving to the left side. he did it in juniors, he did it in syr. and he can do it here. hes making it sound like hes eager to make that switch. "bring it one". gotta love that.

last year he was, with out a doubt, the best value contract in the entire league. production/contact = best value in the entire league and not even close.

pay the kid. enough with the "right side is too small and too expensive" stuff.

his numbers are real. his talent is real. hes a special player. pay him like it.

get it done
 
Gallagher gets pretty much same deal as Kreider. I am a big Gallagher fan albeit you wonder how long his style can be effective for before injuries really start to set in?
Honestly both players are close to 30 and both teams probably offered a bit too much. I guess JG can use the excuse it was precovid with Kreider's deal.
 
Tony on the left is one thing.

Tony on the left with Trouba is something else entirely.

I’m with the poster who said make Lindgren Trouba the matchup pairing. ADA and Fox for offensive situations and draws, Johnson and Smith for the remaining 10 es minutes not taken by the other four.
 
DeAngelo - Fox
Miller - Lundkvist
Lindgren/Robertson/Jones - Schneider

I think we’re looking good long term, that’s a nice mix of styles too

so far in the future.

many things can happen.

theres just as good a chance that some become brady skjei and either underperform or are moved and or both.

the only sure things are ryan tony and adam right now.

the rest are a gamble.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EdJovanovski
Tony on the left is one thing.

Tony on the left with Trouba is something else entirely.

I’m with the poster who said make Lindgren Trouba the matchup pairing. ADA and Fox for offensive situations and draws, Johnson and Smith for the remaining 10 es minutes not taken by the other four.

i like this idea.

do not want tony on a 1st pair playing 1LD. hell get exposed.

something like this makes alot of sense.

ryan/jake- top pair and PK1
tony/adam- 2nd pair and PP1 and PP2
johnson/smith- when appropriate or never lol.

anyone in camp whos ready like miller or hajek can play 3rd pair minutes.

the key is to play the top D guys on the PK and 1st pair 5v5

the top O guys on the PP and 2nd pair 5v5

and the 3rd pair when you can.

thats alot of work for that top pair and another reason ive always been an advocate of 1 Dman only on the PP1. more rest for that other dman.
 
  • Like
Reactions: leetch99
I’ve said it numerous times and I’m glad Vince did this article. Tony dominated junior hockey as an LD. Played there fun the AHL too at times. He’s the best equipped to handle pucks on that side as well as come off the boards and make a play offensively

If he could make it work it could "solve' a lot of problem though we still probably run into cap issues down the road regardless.

I know people aren't gonna agree but if Fox keeps improving I honsetly could see him as a 1D in the future. Depends on how he handles getting heavier minutes and getting out from being sheltered behind Trouba but IMO he has the tools other than size to do it...

Yeah, long-term I think the Fab 5 RD in the system will prove to be more than sufficient to fill the 3 slots. I guess if they are thinking long-term it's no issue. I was assuming the talk was about moving Tony to LD this season.

Smith can play RD...

Johnson/Smith 3rd pair who's ready for this?
 
For 8M Trouba should be able to cover for ADA's deficiencies right?
upload_2020-10-14_19-25-8.jpeg


I think I found the guy with the deficiencies
 
For 8M Trouba should be able to cover for ADA's deficiencies right?

its a pair. jake would have his hands full dealing with his own deficiencies let alone tonys.

they could work together yes but as a matchup 1st pair facing the top forwards in the league, i see tony in a tough spot- especially on his left side or back hand side in the D zone, i think hell struggle.

lets keep ryan there- wholes primarliy a smart D first player. that 1st pair would be able to match up adequately. they are by no means a top pair league wide, but would be adequate.

having said that, the 2nd pair of tony and adam would be a match up nightmare for most teams having to deal with basically a 5 forward line 5v5. they would dominate offensively.

like in life, there are trade offs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EdJovanovski
its a pair.

they could work together yes but as a matchup 1st pair facing the top forwards in the league, i see tony in a tough spot- especially on his left side or back hand side in the D zone, i think hell struggle.

lets keep ryan there- wholes primarliy a smart D first player. that 1st pair would be able to match up adequately. they are by no means a top pair league wide, but would be adequate.

having said that, the 2nd pair of tony and adam would be a match up nightmare for most teams having to deal with basically a 5 forward line 5v5. they would dominate offensively.

like in life, there are trade offs.
I agree with what you are saying, although I think ADA and Trouba could work even in tougher usage. I was being a wise guy about Trouba.
 
I agree with what you are saying, although I think ADA and Trouba could work even in tougher usage. I was being a wise guy about Trouba.

gotcha.

my concern would be tony at the 1LD and the minutes that requires would negate his effectiveness on the PP1 where he can do the most damage.

keep him sheltered from the LD1 responabilities or in other words, minimize his chance for failure and over playing and maximize his chance for success on the PP1.

the brady skjei trade has left a gaping hole. he underperformed yes, but is there anyone here thats better right now on the left side ?

a top 4 of

ryan/jake
tony /adam

its the best we have. 2 primarily defensive guys and 2 offensive guys.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad