Chalfdiggity3
Registered User
So if we aren’t looking for a long term fix, why is signing one of Granlund/Haula/Soderberg for < 1/2 the cost for Monahan without trading any assets a problem?
You’re changing your criteria to conform to your assertion that we should trade ADA for Monahan.
The simple fact is that ADA, with or without Buch, going to Calgary for Hanifan and Monahan or Lindholm has us trading players of higher value for inferior players with higher salaries. There’s not a universe outside of HF where this makes sense.
Avery, I never said that we should trade ADA for monahan. Im not changing any criteria around. Gorton needs to think about all angles and just because you dont want to look at what hes looking to do from a different view bc its different than your assessment doesnt mean its wrong either. Im simply trying to have you understand the other view point beyond your own, which is apparently gortons line of thinking. Not mine. I trust gorton to do whats best for the team.
ex #1
I was speaking about youre previous post about why the trade for monahan or lindholm. Bc it would be great by setting us up for a #2 center for years to come. 3-4 years is a perfect fit for our time line.
ex 2
Yest signing one those guys is okay for this year but still need a long term solution at #2 center. Those guys are at best a #3 center. Chytl like i said has proven incapable of the #2 line center role or really any center role on this team THUS FAR.
ex 3
Also what makes you think that ADA has this tremendous value? While we all like ADA and his ability to put points up. Lets not forget how horrible his defense is. Teams like having defenseman who can play defense while putting up points. Monahan is at his best a 1st line center, at his worst a 2nd line center, same as lindholm. Not really sure what makes you think theyre value is poor?