no to bringing back ANY former rangers. stop
Bring back Brandon Prust to be the head of Public Relations.
no to bringing back ANY former rangers. stop
Not even Blair Betts...?no to bringing back ANY former rangers. stop
That’d be kind of a petulant reason to decline improving your team.Yeah Tony fits their needs like a glove, it’s a shame he was an asshole while there and they hate him
I bet nik Zherdev would be a good fit call him up
I remember making Blair Betts a 90 overall in NHL when I was 13Not even Blair Betts...?
I can hear several posters having aneurysms as they read this.If we trade Tony what about trying to sign Shattenkirk on the cheap? He’d immeidately he able to replace him as the 3RD PP1 player and we’ve already seen him take a discount to play here before.
If we trade Tony what about trying to sign Shattenkirk on the cheap? He’d immeidately he able to replace him as the 3RD PP1 player and we’ve already seen him take a discount to play here before.
I can hear several posters having aneurysms as they read this.
Forget McDonagh. I’m not 100% in favor of doing it, but a Tampa fan just posted their needs in return for Sergachev as follows: RD prospect + young forward. Hmm...
If we trade Tony what about trying to sign Shattenkirk on the cheap? He’d immeidately he able to replace him as the 3RD PP1 player and we’ve already seen him take a discount to play here before.
If we trade Tony what about trying to sign Shattenkirk on the cheap? He’d immeidately he able to replace him as the 3RD PP1 player and we’ve already seen him take a discount to play here before.
I feel like Lundkvist + Chytil or just DeAngelo.Been said already but it almost certainly costs Lundkvist to get Sergachev. That's a big price to pay and it puts the Rangers in an awkward spot in the short term and looking further ahead. You've now got two big-time offensive d-men on the blue line who need contracts. Then you need to worry about losing someone in expansion if you keep them both. They of course would expose Lindgren in this case and that's not the end of the world but I'd hate to lose a viable top-4 D for nothing.
I guess the Rangers could flip everything on it's ear and move both of TDA and Lundkvist but that doesn't seem very likely.
I think Brashear is probably the worst player I’ve ever seen on the RangersAnyone against signing Brashear for tuffness?
No I think Roman Ndur takes that title. Although there are definitely plenty of challengers up there. Ndur was so, so bad.I think Brashear is probably the worst player I’ve ever seen on the Rangers
Eric Reitz was bad but yea. Washed up Brashear was a sight to behold .
Don’t laugh. I could see a scenario where this happens.Is Shattenkirk available?
I feel like Lundkvist + Chytil or just DeAngelo.
I was four when he was on the team lolNo I think Roman Ndur takes that title. Although there are definitely plenty of challengers up there. Ndur was so, so bad.