Well the Rangers are gonna do what they are gonna do and we have no say in it. What they are trying to do might be both compete now and set themselves up for the future, but as the old proverb goes, those who walk in the middle of the street get hit by cars on both sides. I have to ask, why are they better suited for getting players for both now and in the future? Why not get a player for each instead of one player that fulfills both roles? Why not go out and acquire a stud prospect center, and then sign a vet like Erik Haula, Carl Soderberg, Joe Thornton, Jason Spezza, someone who can hold that spot down for a year or two? Why is trading for Lindholm better than that? I'm not sure I would agree.
They have Trouba, Zibenejad, Panarin and Kreider who are 26, 27, 28 and 29, but their true core is absolutely the 25 and under crowd (and really, the 22 and under crowd, because other than Shesterkin, I could argue no one in those 25 or 24 categories are true cornerstones moving forward).
..........
They need another center for that 22 and under group, not 25 and up.
I think this point needs to be reinforced: The Rangers true hope of winning a Cup, or Cups, does not lie with Trouba, Zibanejad, Panarin, and Kreider. Those four do not have a prayer in the world of carrying a team to a Cup.
It's not until Lafreniere, Kakko, Fox, and perhaps 1-2 others from that list have joined them in the upper echelon of NHLers that the team has a real chance at being more than a run of the mill playoff team. And if we have to wait for those guys, then we are waiting on about 10 other guys who will all be entering their primes at about the same time. THAT's the winning core, then. Not Zibanejad at 29 and Kreider at 31. The value of those four (Trouba, Zibanejad, Panarin, and Kreider) is to be the elder vets supporting the elite Kakko/Kravtsov/Chytil/Lafreniere/Fox (and hopefully another center) core.