Speculation: Roster Building Thread: Part LX

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
I suspect the Rangers would like to find a longer term strong solution at center and Strome isn't that guy, even if he plays well again next year. If you can't find something that works, Strome is fine for another year. If you can find a trade to get a younger guy on a decent contract, then you move on from Strome.
This (sort of) is effectively what I said in a previous response. Strome is not long term. Strome is Mr. Right Now. And we know that right now , it works. Given how he has performed with Panarin, there is no panic or a mad rush to come in and replace him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: leetch99
I view him like this. Everyone always wants Mr or Mrs Right. But there are times when Mr or Mrs Right Now is good enough. And that is what Strome is. Mr. Right Now. Right now is not long term. Right now is right now. And right now, it completely works and will come along at a more reasonable rate than trying to bring in Mr. Right. By having Strome right now, it buys some time to a) let Chytil continue to develop and show that he is ready for that spot or b) let the trade market develop and see what assets can be parted with. There just is no rush at this point and time.
That's beautiful.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pld459666
I mean he's a 6'2 220lb kid with elite skating, some bite in his game, and the potential to be a 50 point contributor from the back end. Plenty to like. The real question is he a guy who can grow into a complete player or is he destined to be a 2nd pairing guy who eats up minutes on the PP?
Im just saying people talk about him like he’s Heiskanen. He still has a LOT to prove.

Keep in mind he’s going to cost #22OA + Nils Lundkvist (if not more) and then a 7x7 contract. Trading for this kid is a massive commitment, and possibly not a wise one considering how many people regret Trouba (and Trouba was a lot more proven at the time).
 
Sometimes I do think that we've become to concerned with being "stuck with" Strome that we've not really allowed ourselves to simply "live with" him.

It's very easy to say Strome benefits from Panarin. He most certainly does. But I think we've forgotten that simply having a star player doesn't automatically equate to success for the lucky bastard who gets to play alongside him.

Now obviously we can't get stupid here, and I don't think anyone is under the impression that Strome is their ideal second line pivot, but I also don't think we can discount that a better option is not currently on the roster and you have to make sure you get the right person to fill that role.
 
Sometimes I do think that we've become to concerned with being "stuck with" Strome that we've not really allowed ourselves to simply "live with" him.

It's very easy to say Strome benefits from Panarin. He most certainly does. But I think we've forgotten that simply having a star player doesn't automatically equate to success for the lucky bastard who gets to play alongside him.

Now obviously we can't get stupid here, and I don't think anyone is under the impression that Strome is their ideal second line pivot, but I also don't think we can discount that a better option is not currently on the roster and you have to make sure you get the right person to fill that role.
If Chytil could develop a give-and-go game and figure out face offs, he could be that guy. I have concerns about his playmaking ability. IF he figures center out, he is a dangerous weapon. If not, then he is a winger and the Rangers have better options at wing than him. I think this could be a deciding season for the Rangers concerning Chytil. That is not to say he never gets it, but if he doesn't this year, he may have to figure it out somewhere else.
 
Sometimes I do think that we've become to concerned with being "stuck with" Strome that we've not really allowed ourselves to simply "live with" him.

It's very easy to say Strome benefits from Panarin. He most certainly does. But I think we've forgotten that simply having a star player doesn't automatically equate to success for the lucky bastard who gets to play alongside him.

Now obviously we can't get stupid here, and I don't think anyone is under the impression that Strome is their ideal second line pivot, but I also don't think we can discount that a better option is not currently on the roster and you have to make sure you get the right person to fill that role.
I'm willing to ride with Strome for a season or so alongside giving Chytil a long look at center, if we can't find a better option right now. I rather wait for the right 2C than just grab the first one we can get.
 
I just saw that Trouba is part of the Rangers virtual draft event. You're testing my faith gentlemen.
 
I wouldn't include Kravtsov in that deal. Maybe someone else. Miller is an ok inclusion.
That's fair. I was on the fence about it as well. Honestly, I am not sure what Serg would cost, but I am sure what ever it was would sting quite a bit.
 
Im just saying people talk about him like he’s Heiskanen. He still has a LOT to prove.

Keep in mind he’s going to cost #22OA + Nils Lundkvist (if not more) and then a 7x7 contract. Trading for this kid is a massive commitment, and possibly not a wise one considering how many people regret Trouba (and Trouba was a lot more proven at the time).

I absolutely agree. He's riding a ton of hype right now so it's easy to over project what he become and handing out a major contract based on potential could very quickly tie a large anchor around the rebuild.

That's all part of why I think a guy like Hanafin is perhaps more appealing. Lower cost, locked in to a friendly term and similar upside.
 
I'd rather let our in house LD options cook and re-evaluate in a year or two.

We aren't winning this year anyway. Sign a veteran stopgap and revisit.
Right, so why play?

Lol, not necessarily disagreeing, but with Lafreniere debuting and having bought out Henrik, I guarantee the front office doesn't agree. They get paid to win or come as close as possible. Even Ottawa, they know chances are virtually nil, I think but, what did NYR do in 2005? Assemble a bunch of role players to grind it out (what bad teams do)... to a 4-game loss lol but still... Last season it was safe to say no chance. Now, with what JG has accomplished, is time to hope.
 
Ok, here is my plan. ADA for Lindholm. Trade Strome for whatever. Sign Krug.

Panarin/Lindholm/Fast
Kreider/Zib/Kakko
Laf/Chytil/Buch
Lemiux/Howden/Gauthier

Barron first man up.

Krug/Trouba
Lindgren/Fox
Smith/placeholder

Miller first man up.

Flame away....
 
Ok, here is my plan. ADA for Lindholm. Trade Strome for whatever. Sign Krug.

Panarin/Lindholm/Fast
Kreider/Zib/Kakko
Laf/Chytil/Buch
Lemiux/Howden/Gauthier

Barron first man up.

Krug/Trouba
Lindgren/Fox
Smith/placeholder

Miller first man up.

Flame away....
Is Krug really the type of minute eating shut down defensemen that a team needs on the first pairing to win a cup?
 
Is Krug really the type of minute eating shut down defensemen that a team needs on the first pairing to win a cup?
Krug would become the ld version of what ada was for this team last year: ppqb with limited matchups 5v5. That is not enough to justify the large ufa contract he will probably get
 
Last edited:
Is Krug really the type of minute eating shut down defensemen that a team needs on the first pairing to win a cup?

What shut down first pairing LD is available?

He will take the spot of ADA now, only difference is we need the LD more than the RD.
 
We don’t have a second rounder
just because we dont have one right now doesn't mean that we wont be acquiring one in another trade. I believe Edge has made it pretty obvious nyr is talking with ott about a 2nd for strome if other deal come together, and AG is still not guaranteed to be here even with henke's buyout.

"Dominos"

Realistically I think nyr could use a 3rd or two 3rds to jsutify that swap since 22 isn't exactly at the end of the first round. In a 31 pick round I would consider 22 to be still in the middle of the round. 25-27 is where I would consider it to be the back of or end of the round
 
Last edited:
Oilers fans seemed to like 22 and Georgiev for 14 if Askarov went off the board. I would bet the Rangers would jump on that as well.
I think nyr would still have to add something to make that happen. Some sort of mid round pick, but certainly doable from nyr perspective
 
  • Like
Reactions: Trxjw
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad