I'm not convinced Eichel is better than Zibanejad. You can only go through so many coaches and GMs until you have to look at the players.
Ziba has done some fantastic things, but at the same time, what is his CF% when going up against Bergeron or McDavid and the likes? We have had big problems against the top units around us in the East for a long time and Ziba has not fixed that.
Eichel is fantastic on the PP and what not. But he isn’t a dynamo like Point, Aho, Barzal and the likes. For me, Eichel isn’t a player that makes a team but that is what his cost would be. And yes, to some extent — especially a team like Buffalo — Eichel can be a part of the problem too. While he of course would thrive in say the position Stamkos has had in Tampa.
I just have to say that I think how some players are seen as complete and some as more or less flawed because they aren’t 6’3 is so back wards right now. Like look at the Islanders. Oh they are so big and heavy and built for the POs. Lol Anders Lee is a disaster out there. 8 pts in 19 games despite a ton of PP time. What is the average size of NYIs top scorers in the PO? 5’11? They are lead by soft finesse players.
I listened to some podcast with I think it was Custance and co a while ago, and they just lost it when they got to the topic of Josh Andersson. Oh he is so awsome. If you can get someone like him, you can’t pass on that opportunity. Etc etc etc.
This is a guy who had 1+3 last season. Sure in like 30 games and sure maybe he wasn’t 100%. But still. Why the superlatives?
Eichel covers very little ice and has very low mobility. His size is seen as a positive, but I think it holds him back because he can’t skate with the smaller centers. Like what evidence is there that guys like him leads successful teams in the NHL? Compared to say guys like Barzal, Point, Aho and the likes? Honestly, I don’t think he is on the same level as those 3 guys.