Maybe not this coming year, but certainly the next ones, we need to bring in veterans that have won cups to lead the core and young players. The leadership and knowledge is an invaluable part of the growing and development of a winning team.
Wonder about the up and coming buyouts. Likely there will be a few interesting stopgap options outta that...
I recall a couple of Minny fans throwing out their #1, a prospect, and Brodin in 2016 for Stepan and people trashing it. Meanwhile I was licking my chops at the idea of picking up Brodin and McAvoy in one trade.
Oh, for anyone raising an eyebrow at that, I checked the google machine for a receipt: Speculation: - Offseason Thread: Officially Offseason
![]()
Maybe not this coming year, but certainly the next ones, we need to bring in veterans that have won cups to lead the core and young players. The leadership and knowledge is an invaluable part of the growing and development of a winning team.
It took them a year longer to embrace what I thought they should do in that thread.
Speculation: - Offseason Thread: Officially Offseason
I recall a couple of Minny fans throwing out their #1, a prospect, and Brodin in 2016 for Stepan and people trashing it. Meanwhile I was licking my chops at the idea of picking up Brodin and McAvoy in one trade.
Oh, for anyone raising an eyebrow at that, I checked the google machine for a receipt: Speculation: - Offseason Thread: Officially Offseason
![]()
Probably not wrong on that. But then what is stop gap here? 3-4 years at $4m? That is stop gappish enough.He may, but he won't be looking for a "stop gap" contract.
Not to rain on the parade, but there is absolutely no way that they will be able to afford to sign a Barkov.The timing of the nhls flat cap is a real advantage for us. The Rangers are sitting on the best prospect system in hockey and in 1 year a lot of cap flexibility. This will provide a ton of leverage. I’m of the opinion that the Rangers hold steadfast for one year,see what they have in lhd prospects and target a specific player or two like Barkov or lindrum next year. I can personally live with watching a borderline playoff team in which the youth are evaluated for one more year.
It took them a year longer to embrace what I thought they should do in that thread.
Speculation: - Offseason Thread: Officially Offseason
Are you that Buchdaddy guy?- Said literally nobody ever. Your first problem is bestowing the dime a dozen 90s enforcer moniker on RR when anyone who actually watches hockey sees how much he impacts the game when he's on the ice. Richards (an undrafted defensive specialist) and Gettinger (a perennial 4A player who will never sniff the bottom-6 again) over Reavo??? Thanks for the laughs man.
looking back at that thread is wild...it feels like several life times ago. so much has changed since then its mind blowing.
I have my doubts.Only way I could see them affording Barkov is by not committing to Zibanejad
looking back at that thread is wild...it feels like several life times ago. so much has changed since then its mind blowing.
Might not be the worst play considering you gain 2 years younger, but risky to try to thread that needle.Only way I could see them affording Barkov is by not committing to Zibanejad
Yeah, and it’s basically not a one time thing either.
All I can say is, keep flexibility. Commit to younger players that can be moved.
Seriously, isn’t it much better to overpay for a younger player without full NMCs for 7 years than to take a stab at a vet that will be here until 2029 and never can be traded?
But think of the absolute haul Zibanejad would bring back in trade. They could set themselves up with a long run of contending for the cupMight not be the worst play considering you gain 2 years younger, but risky to try to thread that needle.
We’re not making this a thing.But think of the absolute haul Zibanejad would bring back in trade. They could set themselves up with a long run of contending for the cup
A concept that seems ridiculously obvious to me yet still seems to be a minority position. It’s hard to ever have good contracts if you are signing everyone at 27. You can get out of a Skjei contract...you can’t get out of a Shattenkirk.
Brodin's clause is kicked in.Would anyone trade Trouba for Brodin before their clauses kick in?