I'm sure they're interested in Shestyerkin, Kakko and the 1OA also. Doesn't mean any of them would be part of any deal with Buffalo.Buffalo has confirmed interest in DeAngelo. That was the whole point, belying what @Allucks was suggesting. Thanks anyway.
I'm sure they're interested in Shestyerkin, Kakko and the 1OA also. Doesn't mean any of them would be part of any deal with Buffalo.
Kreider has a full NMC and would likely use it against Buffalo.All the trade ideas around here don't include any players with salary going back to Buffalo. Haven't seen Trouba or Kreider mentioned. What am I missing? How are all these players getting paid in a few years or are we trading a bunch of our own players coming off their ELCs?
I don't think its happening and understand a trade for Eichel should sting but c'mon... at least start with something around Kreider, TDA and Chytil to make in interesting.
So…why is ADA absolutely part of a deal for Eichel?
As I said earlier, every team in the league wants a Jack Eichel but that comes at a price. We're not in any position right now where we need to pay that price. We're fine doing what we're doing.
If we were like right there and making a move to go over the top, I could see it. I cannot stress enough how far we are from that. Our hot finish to the regular season (which was basically just Zibanejad, let's be real) sanitized how bad this team still is. We got clowned in the play-in by a team that hadn't beaten us since they were the f***in Whalers so that should tell you how ready we are.
Now is the time to exercise patience. This is the easiest off-season of all-time. You walk up to the podium, you say hi to mom, and you say "Alexis Lafreniere." Boom. Done. Ingenuous. Hire Machinehead.
So… because the Rangers are willing to discuss ADA, and because Buffalo has interest in ADA, ADA will be a part of any deal for Eichel? No. That's a leap.Because he’s someone the Rangers are willing to discuss about trading, much like Buchnevich, Strome, Lemieux and Georgiev.
Could be wrong but I believe because of the Return to Play rules, Kreider's NMC goes into effect on 10/9 at 9PM after the 1st round of the draft.Kreider has a full NMC and would likely use it against Buffalo.
The price is going to be Lafreniere+.I disagree with your premise. Eichel is 23 years old and one of the very best centers in the game. A true #1 not even in his prime yet. The Rangers should pay the price if he's available.
The price is going to be Lafreniere+.
When to have an asset like this, teams aren't going to deal in good faith.
It reminds me of when the Yankees effectively couldn't trade for a year because nobody would even negotiate if it wasn't for Gleyber Torres.
When Eichel gets here and we're still bad, people are gonna wish we had the 18 year old still on an ELC.
Not to mention the whole point of this either be to have Eichel *and* Zibanejad. We're not keeping Zibanejad after taking on Eichel's contract.
If so, then the clause that is in effect is the 11-team NTC on his last contract, and there's no way Buffalo isnt on that.Could be wrong but I believe because of the Return to Play rules, Kreider's NMC goes into effect on 10/9 at 9PM after the 1st round of the draft.
Speculate away, lol but again I just don't see an Eichel trade happening. Not unless some salary is going back to Buffalo.
If so, then the clause that is in effect is the 11-team NTC on his last contract, and there's no way Buffalo isnt on that.
If so, then the clause that is in effect is the 11-team NTC, and there's no way Buffalo isnt on that.
I mean IF Eichel is actually requesting a trade the Sabres aren't in a position to be demanding a player like Laf or Kakko.The price is going to be Lafreniere+.
When you have an asset like this, teams aren't going to deal in good faith.
It reminds me of when the Yankees effectively couldn't trade for a year because nobody would even negotiate if it wasn't for Gleyber Torres.
When Eichel gets here and we're still bad, people are gonna wish we had the 18 year old still on an ELC.
Not to mention the whole point of this would be to have Eichel *and* Zibanejad. We're not keeping Zibanejad after taking on Eichel's contract.
It wouldn't cost Lafreniere, just won't and it doesn't make sense for the Rangers.The price is going to be Lafreniere+.
When you have an asset like this, teams aren't going to deal in good faith.
It reminds me of when the Yankees effectively couldn't trade for a year because nobody would even negotiate if it wasn't for Gleyber Torres.
When Eichel gets here and we're still bad, people are gonna wish we had the 18 year old still on an ELC.
Not to mention the whole point of this would be to have Eichel *and* Zibanejad. We're not keeping Zibanejad after taking on Eichel's contract.
Eichel has a contract with the Buffalo Sabres whether he likes it or not. They're going to ask for your best asset and somebody will give it to them. It's madness to think this won't cost us a ransom.I mean IF Eichel is actually requesting a trade the Sabres aren't in a position to be demanding a player like Laf of Kakko.